FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
The very fact of domestic violence being alleged means -- even though you may not see it as a violent move -- that a violent move was taken or you would not have been arrested and charged with domestic VIOLENCE.
You are out of line. Blue did not say anything that was wrong. If CPS steps in (which they can due to abuse/endangerment of the child for being there when a DV incident took place), you would be forced to take parenting classes. You and mom don't seem to understand the seriousness of this...
Doesn't matter. Mom is the only parent of this child with enforceable rights. You tried to force your way past her. She didn't want you to do that. You touched her. That is assault. Hence when she called the police why you were arrested.
No. You did not sign the birth certificate. You may have signed the AOP (Affidavit of Paternity) with your girlfriend. But you have no enforceable legal rights to the child without a court order since you and mom were not married.
Have you established paternity? And don't say you signed the birth certificate because that is NOT a thing that happens. It would be an AOP. But unless you have established paternity and have court orders, MOM is the ONLY legal custodian of the child.
Then she lied the first time around when she called them which is a crime as well -- filing a false police report.
Yes you and mom are using your child -- hence why you and she behaved the way you did. It is not nonsense. I am an attorney who defends parents against CPS. Guess what? CPS can...
You might look to see if there are forms provided by your county to file for a pro se divorce.
Like here: https://selfhelp.nvcourts.gov/forms/divorce-forms
It does matter it was not the victim's own vehicle. The owner is the only one with standing. Now the owner could request funding for a rental car or the like and give it to OP but OP has not lost anything.
It isn't useless feedback. You have no legal claims. You have no legal proof. You have no losses. Hence, you will get nothing. The only one entitled to replacement transportation is the owner of the car. That wasn't you. You cannot prove your child was traumatized. Why? Because you done nothing...
Your son would have to pursue a lawsuit on his own as he is an adult. And without a psychiatrist there is no proof of trauma. Breaking something has nothing to do with a psychiatrist. And you hired and fired someone within a week? Calling BS.
But that could also deal with the manufacturers of said furniture because why should they EVER make furniture with sharp edges? Again, I want the OP to answer why they do not feel they have to supervise the child or what responsibility they have.
@Litigator22 -- I am an attorney in Ohio that has practiced in family courts around the state. Courts here will not let a pro se individual have a second person at the table. Those with counsel can only have their attorney(s) at the table with them. Witnesses will be sitting in the hall. The...
Tell the attorney that if you do not get a response and they don't prove that they have sent a demand letter, you are filing a complaint against them with the bar. And then do so.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.