FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
It appears your insurance provider is denying it regardless of the drain issue
But if the hose was pushed out or the drain pipe, it’s a pretty good proof of either improper installation or a failed installation. The first one makes it not covered. The second one; depends on what failed and why.
Texas law requires posting signs. If the signs are not posted, no amount of verbal notice or flyers will provide op protections for violating the law. It may get quite expensive for the op to tow cars without complying with the applicable laws.
It appears the ops concern isn’t with attending school and working full time but that she will be ineligible for welfare if she is attending school.
Why somebody decided to reinterpret that very clear statement to state she’s couldn't work while attending school full time is beyond me.
Maybe...
Did you mean the washer drain hose? The closest thing on a dryer to a drain hose ports hot air to the outside.
You aren’t very clear on the situation. Either the hose came out or the drain or it didn’t. Is it secured in there with nylon zip ties or anything else?
Has this drain ever...
I said employers. The building manager has no authority in this situation. The employers do.
If it isn’t important enough to spend the time visiting each employer than I guess it isn’t that big of a deal for you either.
Reporting it as being in error won’t be getting anybody in trouble. It does allow the postal service to cancel the change of address though. Without cancelling it the op will continue to get fils mail until the change of address expires.
Your post 5 simply said to take the mail to the post...
If you are worried about offending the violators you’ve pretty much ruled out doing what it takes to remedy the situation. While prohibiting them from parking there isn’t as offensive as towing their cars,, it’s bound to upset some people (the entitled folks)
Have you spoken to the actual...
Well, I don’t know too many successful criminals that broadcast their intent.
This wasn’t meant to acsuse the op but the situation is odd. I would actualy expect a disgruntled child to be more likely to do this this
Anyway, if the op has verification this happened he should take whatever...
They do that?:ROFLMAO:
But how would op know who submitted the change of address?
This sounds a bit odd to me, almost like somebody was considering doing this and trying to figure out if they could get into trouble.
So you’re saying a landlord has no exposure under the laws of premises liability in this situation?
Also, there is no comparison between speaking of a family with children and a person operating a business from her rented home.
I’m guessing things aren’t quite as mutual and agreeable as you felt they were when divorcing.
You know the mother and situation. Nobody here does. If this appears to be a one off thing, maybe there is some reason for the lack of contact or withdrawing agreement the children be with you...
The time for the sub to file for a lien may have passed but that doesn’t mean the sub doesn’t have a right to sue the op. I can’t say if the subcontractor has a direct line to the consumer but even if they don’t, the sub could sue the prime and the prime may have an action against the op (again...
If there is no legally enforceable custody order in place, she has no legal obligation to be anywhere at any particular time (regarding the children). She has no obligation to allow you contact with the children
Hopefully this is simply an issue that isn’t what it appears to be and she will...
My beef was you said the subcontractor had no actions against the op. That was the incorrect statement.
At least mine was correct based on only what had been presented. The dates weren’t known (nor the possible exceptions regarding an owner occupied residence) so while mind might be shown...
Landlord is not faxing it to the tenant. He is faxing it to a third party who will post or deliver it on his behalf.
Nothing wrong with what the op is suggesting.
Of course as another said it could mean the delivery person attend court to testify to their actions but in itself, there is...
So It is in excess of the 6 months
But if anybody bothers to read what I write not only did I not say with any certainty a lien was possible (I stated it was a general statement and hadn’t checked specific state law. It was a response to ldij’s statement that op wouldn’t owe money to a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.