FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
It would depend how aggressive the people pursuing the judgement is. TBE assets are restricted. They might argue you're hiding wages that would be subject to garnishment if they haven't already hit the cap on doing those elsewhere (that's an example of the rebutting that might happen).
If you maintain your bank accounts, then yes the tax return deposit will be protected against a judgment solely against one of the spouses. You'd best verify your bank accounts are held that way. It's not inherent in just listing a married couple's names and not all Florida banks will even...
You don't want to go through arbitration for this. Disclosure: I am a FINRA arbitrator. I would be the type of person who ends up on a panel to decide these things. Arbitration isn't a good place to go pro se on anything and it isn't speedy. I've got hearings just coming up for cases...
While you might not still collect, it's not possible to dissolve a corporation or LLC without addressing pending debts/judgments. To do invites personal action against the members of the LLC, invalidating whatever protection they thought the LLC was giving against their personal assets.
Probably not, but there is likely a redemption period where you pay off 100% of what was owed and you can get it back (if you have the means to do it).
Every time I've been summoned for jury duty, I never got past the "call in the night before" stage. One time with federal court, I got the "you can stop calling" after three days. Our state court here told me after the first call in that I wasn't going to be needed.
I'll repeat, there is no obligation to force the landlord to enforce this.
You can get out of the lease, possibly recovering costs to move, etc... Fortunately landlord-tenant while not falling under the small claims provisions, is still heard principally in General District Court, which is a...
I alluded to that, but the remedy for the breach of quiet enjoyment (or perhaps habitability) is to get him out of the obligation to continue to reside there and pay the rent.
You're not paying attention. The lease binds the responsibility YOU have and YOUR landlord specifically have. Unless it says "The landlord will keep others from smoking" just because they have a clause in their lease similar to yours doesn't give you any right to force him to do something.
Understand that just because YOUR lease bans YOU from smoking doesn't give you any rights to demand the landlord bar others (regardless of whether it is in your lease). The lease gives the landlord the right to take action against them, not you. Unless your lease says that the landlord will...
They would still need letters of administration showing that the estate authorizes that transfer. I've never seen a car manufacturer/finance company offer such other than on initial purchase. Unless we're talking about a lease situation rather than straight financing.
No Toyota didn't. Toyota can't grant ownership of a car that belongs to someone else. What they can do is allow you to become responsible for paying the loan. The way you become owner of a car that someone else owned (not joint with you) is you get the person administering their estate to...
Note, that I'm not aware of anything in the education titles (even private universities usually take some public funding) that requires an accommodation here, but it's quite possible the University might provide one if you ask nice. Being afraid of a reaction isn't a "disability."
It's too late. If your biological father had been in Virginia when he died, and you had proof that you are his biological daughter, then you had ONE YEAR from the time he died to make that claim. Even then it would only matter if he was intestate (or if the will didn't specifically list the...
Right, but what happens when you file for a registration is you'll get contacted once it's assigned to an examiner. That occurs at the address you provide. Now if the OP wanted to forward the correspondence that would be one thing, but if he RTS (or just discards) it, the registration isn't...
And what if he did? I'm not seeing a course of action here. If he fails to give the USPTO an address that he will receive correspondence from, he's not going to get very far. If you RTS the subsequent correspondence they won't ever approve it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.