• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

30 yr vs 5 yr arm

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

jcweb

Junior Member
What is the name of your state?IL
We are in the process of refinancing our rental property--right now we have a 30 year at 6%...my mortgage broker said he is working with 2 lenders and he said they may want to do a 5 year ARM versus the 30 year (at 5.85%) because most lenders want 2 years of landlord ownership---we will have owned the house for 2 years in January 05.....is this normal? I don't think we would consider a 5 year
ARM-are there any advantages of an ARM? I think we are lucky to have a 30 year at 6% on a NOOP and would be great if we could get a 30 year at 5.85%---aren't we close enough to the 2 year ownership? Any advice would be appreciated
thanks
 


jcweb

Junior Member
We are refinancing to cash out and pay off credit cards----the house was appraised at $238,000 and we owe $148,000 and are cashing out $25,000 to pay off the credit cards---the interest rate is not our main concern (just so we can keep it at 6 or below) but we really need to pay off these cards and get back on track....
 

MORTGAGEman

Junior Member
It all depends on how long you plan on keeping the rental property. If you plan on keeping the rental property for 10 years than the 5/1 ARM isn't the way to go. If you plan on holding onto the property for 3 or 4 years than you might as well go with the 5/1 ARM instead of the 30 year fixed because it generally has a lower interest rate. A 5/1 ARM is fixed for 5 years and adjusts with the market every year after that.


The question is how long do you plan on holding on to the property?
 

jcweb

Junior Member
I'm not sure how long we plan on having that property--the house itself is old but it is in a great location (chicago burbs--close to train) and they are doing tear downs all around it and putting up million dollar homes--we actually got a great deal on it--so we will probably hold onto it--right now we just need the money--I would even take a 30 year at 5.9%--just let us cash out some of our equity (we did not qualify for a HELOC--fico is 10 pts too low)....is there any reason my broker would PREFER me to do an ARM? He said the rate would be the same for an ARM versus a 30 year--so just give me the 30 year, right?
 

MORTGAGEman

Junior Member
I can't think of any benefit for him besides trying to sell you on a lower interest rate. Is he charging you any points? How much did he say closing costs were?
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top