There you go, my friend.![]()
I have one question what is the purpose of a foster home. Is it to take care of a child that was removed until reunification with parents or to have kids placed in their home and then feel they have the rights to adopt this child and not placed back home with parents or biological family. If every child that is placed in foster care should be adopted if the foster parents become attached then the child welfare should change their motto from reunification to adoption from the beginining because it contradicts their whole motto of reunification. I am not bashing foster parents because I personally think they are awesome but from reading these posts I have formed my own impression that some foster parents feel once a child is placed with them they have the right to adopt them if they choose and not return these kids home if the parents/family is appropriate or has completed a service plan. Most service plan are not completed for about a year so most kids will remain in care for that long. Then some foster parents are going to feel that this child should not return home even if the parents have demonstrated all skills and efforts. Why even have a service plan just tell these parents that your kids are removed for whatever reason and they are not going to be returned to you but rather adopted by someone that can provide more than you can. I know some parents do not deserve to have their children returned home but what about those that deserve that. Its funny in life when someone is not in anothers person shoe they can say anything. How would you feel id your child was removed from you because of a variety of reasons possible and you realized your mistake and decided to fix it and then someone told you your child is in an adoptable home and bonded so he or she should remain there. You would be highly upset and fight like crazy if you truly love your child. The child welfare system was not meant to be an adoption agency it main reason based on what they teach is reunification and if that cannot work adoption. Im not sure how adoption seem to become to first goal now. Once again, I am not bashing foster parents because if a parent and no family member are available to provide a home the child should be paced for adoption. Adoption in my book was meant for children whose parents was not able to provide for them and it is in the child best interest to be adopted. My impression of these post seemed like once a child is in foster care for even six months the child should remain there no matter who come forward to provide care. Go back and look into the child welfare agency and you will see thats not their laws at all. They need to change it so everyone could be on the same page.