calysto999;3162244]I am a co-owner on her accounts along w. a sibling per her request years ago. Her money is in separate accounts, I do not have any of her funds in my accounts
. Yet you said you had ownership of the accounts containing her frozen assets. Even being a co-owner would likely be considered a problem. There is no justification to be a co-owner. It would allow improper access to the funds and allow for an improper claim of the funds in the case of the principal's death.
I disagree, the DOL allows authorized representatives (as I mentioned below) to charge up to a max % of a claim, which is the charge I indicated of $30K. I did not and can not act as an attorney, but she signed me as an authorized representative and I followed the DOL rules for this position.
I asked you what gives you the right to make such a claim for payment. Since the DOL deals with a variety of issues and I could find nothing allowing such a payment to a non-attorney, I was simply looking for you to show where the DOL authorizes such a payment.
If she is declared incompetent, her funds will go to a guardian under a ruling. HOWEVER, this claim was put forth over a year ago, I don't expect the incompetence thing to go back that far, she only recently was having problems w. dating sites and scammers. Maybe three or so months.
incompetency does not simply sprout up overnight. If she had had problems supported by behavior that caused these problem 3 or so months ago, it is likely the incompetency had developed over a much longer time which brings her ability to contract into question.
regardless of all of that, since her accounts are frozen due to some legal issues, you either wait out the seizure or seek to have whatever you claim is owed released. You would have to make such a motion in the court that has authorized the seizure of the funds.