MySonsMom said:
Ok, that makes sense. So signing a lease is pretty vital when it comes to renting. It protects both the tenant and the landlord.
So in the event there is a lease signed, the landlord cannot evict a tenant for no reason.
As far as *problems* with a tenant...(ie: noise/complaints/problems) the landlord would simply log the complaints and *could* evict if problems persist even WITH a lease??
MSM
My response:
Assuming there's a lease, the landlord doesn't have to keep a "scorecard" or a log of events if there's a breach of the lease. All it can take is one, single, event (a breach) - - and then it's adios to the tenant, if that's what the landlord chooses to do.
For example, if the lease has a "morals" clause, or a Criminal Conduct clause, and the tenant has, only one time, let's say, allowed drug dealing on the demised premises, then the landlord is within his/her rights to evict.
But, it doesn't even have to be a breach that is that serious. It could even be that the tenant has brought a dog into the demised premises, and the landlord can issue a Notice to Quit. Even if the tenant immediately cures the breach by getting rid of the pet one hour later - - the fact remains that the breach has already occurred, and the landlord doesn't have to accept the "cure".
There are some landlords just "itching" to get rid of certain tenants, and waiting for any reason and opportune time. You and I both know there are unreasonable landlords. But, as long as a breach of the lease has occurred, the landlord is within their rights.
IAAL