laundryboy
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Utah. Our home was under contract for six weeks starting the end of May 2017. Buyer represented it as a cash deal with 30 days closing. After all contingencies had expired, Buyer came to us a week before closing and said they actually had a commercial property to sell and would we extend the closing a week or two because they really didn't have the cash. We accepted with the requirement of additional earnest money down. They declined to do so. The Buyers realtor issued their earnest money to us. I am wondering if we can seek specific performance or any other compensation for having our home off the market during the prime season...because they were dishonest in representing this as a cash deal and they had a legal and moral obligation to buy our home. Just wondering what others think of this situation, our realtor suggested we could pursue this. I've spoken to a couple local attorneys trying to educate myself and one felt we could and one didn't. I'm not sure what my damages could be anyways, but it was sure wrong and disappointing of them to represent themselves as they did. Had we known it was contingent on the sale of a commercial property, the contract would have had deadlines with compensation for not meeting them and more earnest money down because of our risk. Any thoughts would be appreciated.