nocinderella
Junior Member
What is the name of your state?Arizona
I was wondering if the state had distributed payments sent in a certain way and that way was proven in the payment history could they then when calculating what was owed change the way they distributed the payments?
An example: federal income tax intercepted in 1987 applied to arrears.
Payment of three-huindred sent in in January 1989 current
monthly support is two-hundred, so two hundred is applied
toward the current child support owed that month and the
remaining one-hundred goes toward reducing the arrears.
Case ends up with three judgments child emancipates and state does the final calculation of what is owed and ignores the three judgments and just calculates from day one that a payment is made or missed. Can they do this?
I was wondering if the state had distributed payments sent in a certain way and that way was proven in the payment history could they then when calculating what was owed change the way they distributed the payments?
An example: federal income tax intercepted in 1987 applied to arrears.
Payment of three-huindred sent in in January 1989 current
monthly support is two-hundred, so two hundred is applied
toward the current child support owed that month and the
remaining one-hundred goes toward reducing the arrears.
Case ends up with three judgments child emancipates and state does the final calculation of what is owed and ignores the three judgments and just calculates from day one that a payment is made or missed. Can they do this?