• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Do I have a malpractice case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juliet
  • Start date Start date

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

J

Juliet

Guest
In August, my husband came in from mowing the lawn complaining of severe abdominal pain. It worsened, so I took him the ER. The Dr diagnosed flu but did a catscan and discovered an aneurysm. He advised following up the next week with a visit to a specialist but in the meantime to treat the flu. No stool sample was taken although he has walked out of the room several times to use the rest room.

He spends the night in a chair because of severe pain and passes out in the night. His pain increases and he tells me he is passing much blood in his stool and the pain is spreading to his back. We return to the ER and this time I stay with him in the examining room. Different doctor, she can't read the illegible report from previous night so I advise her of catscan. She leaves the room. I step out into the hallway and hear her on the phone trying to locate the Xray. She returns, makes no mention of xray, says this is a very nasty flu, take him home and pump him full of fluids and keep him away from grandchildren. She says he is fainting because of dehydration. So I pump him full of fluids although he says it hurts to drink. She advised me to call the next day to get the result of stool sample and find out what type of flu it is and how to treat it. I call. No results yet. She says call next day. That night my husband faints and I have trouble reviving him so call 911. They are able to bring him to and say his vital signs are very strong. I ask if he passed out because of dehydration and they say No, look at how he is sweating. My husband spends another night in the chair because of pain.

I call for the results of the specimen test the next day and she says it is a viral flu and he will be a very sick man for several days. I keep trying to get fluids into him.

He spends another night in the chair because of severe pain.
Towards evening he complains of worsening back pain and can hardly stand. I call the hospital to advise we are returning and go to get the car out. When I return, he says he cannot breathe and falls to the floor. I call 911, they respond, hook him up to machinery and transport him to the hospital ( a different hospital-my daughters choice). After a 7 hour operation, he passes away and the death certificate lists an aneurysm as cause of death.

This was a 4 day nightmare. Up until the day of his stomach pain, he was a happy, healthy man with an outstanding health and work record. I miss him terribly and find it hard to accept his sudden passing.

The second ER doctor calls as I am leaving the house for his funeral to check on his status. When I inform her of his passing she is quite surprised and I hear a quick intake of breath.....

Do I have any recourse?
Thank you
 


P

PamSJS

Guest
Dear Juliet;

You need to go immediately to a medical malpractice/negligence attorney. Try to get copies of your husbands medical records from the hospital, including copies of the CT scan and the radiology report. This information will be very helpful to your attorney.

My heart goes out to you. Your husband was a victim of medical negligence. If he had an abdominal aneurysm, he should have been taken immediately to the operating room, not sent back home!

Best of luck to you and God bless you and your family.

Pam
 
J

Juliet

Guest
Dear PamSJS,
Thank you so much for your advice.
My daughter has been after me to contact a lawyer since this happened, but I've been reluctant to "relive" this experience and I'm not sure just what would be involved.
How cooperative are hospitals in turning over records, reports, etc.?

Will "taking on" the medical profession cause problems in the future for myself and/or members of my family, should it be necessary to seek medical attention from these hospitals or professionals?

Thank you again - also for your kind words. These last several months have been a roller coaster o emotions for me.

 
P

PamSJS

Guest
Dear Juliet;

Most hospitals assume that when a patient or next of kin requests copies of medical records, a lawsuit is forthcoming. They may make excuses, or even tell you they are not allowed to release the records. Most states now have laws allowing patients to access their medical records. In your case, since your husband is deceased, you should be able to get copies of his records.

You might want to contact a med mal attorney before you request the records. In any case, if the lawyer takes your case, he CAN get the records. Most attorneys offer a free initial consultation and will take this type of case on a contingency fee basis, i.e., he doesn't get paid unless you get paid.

As for the hospitals treating you or members of your family: I would be very reluctant to take a family member to a hospital like the ones you have described. By law, a hospital may not turn you away in the event of a real emergency.

Let me know if I can help you further.

Pam
 
A

ADL1989

Guest
Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice

This is a most terrifying ordeal, I am very very sorry for your great loss. Let me know if there is any help you may need. I can send you the malpractice guidelines in your state. Everything is printed for you in Laymen terminology so you can understand what to expect.
 
J

Juliet

Guest
Re: Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice

ADL1989 said:
This is a most terrifying ordeal, I am very very sorry for your great loss. Let me know if there is any help you may need. I can send you the malpractice guidelines in your state. Everything is printed for you in Laymen terminology so you can understand what to expect.
\

I thank you for your concern and kind words. I would very much appreciate the malpractice guidelines for Wisconsin. I have no idea where to begin with something like this. I have never been involved with the courts so don't know if a court appearance or jury trial is required. I am sure the guidelines will advise me.
Thanks so much!
 
A

ADL1989

Guest
Med Mal

WISCONSIN

Statutes of Limitations Statutory Cap on Attorneys' Fees
Contributory or Comparative Negligence Periodic Payments
Joint and Several Liability Collateral Source Rule
Contribution Pre-Judgment Interest
Vicarious Liability Patient Compensation Funds
Expert Testimony Immunities
Damage Caps Arbitration



Statutes of Limitations

Wisconsin requires that all medical malpractice actions for personal injury or death be filed within three years from the date of injury. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(1) (West 1997). The statute also provides that a claimant may bring an action for medical malpractice within one year from the date of discovery, subject to a maximum limit of five years from the date of the negligent act. Id. However, the five-year limit was recently held to be unconstitutional insofar as it applied to a claimant who could not reasonably have known of her injury, which was caused by a failure to diagnose cancer, until after five years had passed. Estate of Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund, 211 Wis. 2d 41, 564 N.W.2d 662 (1997). Foreign object cases must be brought within one year from the date of discovery or three years from the date of the incident. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(3) (West 1997).

Actions brought by or on behalf of a minor are subject to the above-noted limitation, or such actions must be brought by the time the minor reaches ten years of age, whichever is later. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.56 (West 1997). For claimants who are disabled by reason of insanity, an action may be commenced two years from the date the disability has been lifted, with a maximum of five years from the date of the negligent act. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.16 (West 1997).

Contributory or Comparative Negligence

In Wisconsin, a claimant's negligence does not bar recovery if that negligence was not greater than that of the person against whom recovery is sought. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 895.045 (West 1997). The claimant's negligence is compared separately to the negligence of each person against whom recovery is sought, and damages are diminished in proportion to the claimant's negligence. Id.

Joint and Several Liability

Under the statutory system of comparative negligence discussed in Contributory or Comparative Negligence, only a defendant found to be 51 percent or more causally negligent is jointly and severally liable. A defendant who is less than 51 percent causally negligent is liable only for his own percentage of negligence, unless he acted as part of a common scheme or plan. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 895.045 (West 1997).

Contribution

A joint tortfeasor who pays more than his equitable share of the total damages is afforded a right to contribution against the other tortfeasors. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Schara, 56 Wis. 2d 262, 201 N.W.2d 758 (1972). A settlement by one tortfeasor does not alter the right to contribution. Id. The equitable shares are determined by reference to the tortfeasors' relative degrees of fault as allocated by the finder of fact under Wis. Stat. Ann. § 895.045 (West 1997). Pachowitz v. Milwaukee Suburban Transport Corp., 56 Wis. 2d 383, 202 N.W.2d 268 (1972). Wisconsin courts allow the issue of contribution to be determined in the original litigation. See, e.g., Johnson v. Heintz, 73 Wis. 2d 286, 243 N.W.2d 815 (1974).

Vicarious Liability

Wisconsin has recognized that a hospital may be liable for the negligent acts of an independent contracting physician based on an apparent agency theory. Pamperin v. Trinity Memorial Hospital, 144 Wis. 2d 188, 423 N.W.2d 848 (1988). The Wisconsin Supreme Court held in Pamperin that when a hospital holds itself out to the public as providing complete medical care, patients rely on the hospital to provide qualified and competent physicians, and thus, the hospital is responsible for the acts of physicians in its facilities.

Expert Testimony

Ordinarily, expert testimony is necessary to establish the standard of care and to clarify the manner in which the defendant's act deviated from the standard of care, but it is not needed if only routine care within the jury's common knowledge is at issue. Kujawski v. Arbor View Health Care Center, 139 Wis. 2d 455, 407 N.W.2d 249 (1987) (expert not needed to find liability against nursing home for failure to fasten wheelchair seat belt).

Damage Caps

Except in death cases, for any medical malpractice occurrence on or after May 25, 1995, the total limit on non-economic damages from all health care providers is $350,000. This limit is adjusted annually for inflation. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(4) (West 1997). The court will reduce any jury award that exceeds this amount. Id. (A former damage cap was found to be unconstitutional insofar as it applied retroactively, Martin v. Richardson, 192 Wis. 2d 156, 531 N.W.2d 70 (1995), but the current statute is prospective only.)

Damages in wrongful death cases are governed by Wis. Stat. Ann. § 895.04(4) (West 1997), even when the death is caused by medical malpractice. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(4) (West 1997). Until recently, non-economic damages were limited to $150,000. However, 1997 Wis. Act 89 has amended this section for cases filed on or after April 28, 1998, increasng the limit to $500,000 for the death of a minor and $350,000 for the death of an adult. 1997-1998 Wis. Legis. Serv. 1535 (West). (See Patient Compensation Funds and Physician Insurance for a discussion of state-sponsored excess insurance.)

Statutory Cap on Attorneys' Fees

Attorneys' fees in medical malpractice cases are limited to the following: (a) 33 1/3 percent of the first $1,000,000 recovered, (b) 25 percent of the first $1,000,000 recovered if liability was stipulated within 180 days after the complaint was filed and no later than 60 days before the first day of trial, and (c) 20 percent of any amount that exceeds $1,000,000. The court, however, can approve attorneys' fees beyond these limits in exceptional circumstances. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.013 (West 1995).

Periodic Payments

If a medical malpractice settlement or judgment resulting from an act or omission on or after May 25, 1995, provides for future medical expense payments in excess of $100,000, the present value of that excess is paid into the Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund. Each claimant has his own account within the fund, which earns interest, and medical payments are made from that account until it is exhausted or the claimant dies. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.015 (West Supp. 1997). A somewhat similar system, which was in effect prior to 1986, was held to be constitutional. State ex rel. Strykowski v. Wilkie, 81 Wis. 2d 491, 261 N.W.2d 434 (1978).

Collateral Source Rule

Effective May 25, 1995, evidence of any compensation from a collateral source is admissible in an action to recover damages for medical malpractice. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(7) (West 1997). This is a change from the common law rule formerly applied, under which a claimant could recover the total value of his loss regardless of payments from other sources. Rixmann v. Somerset Public Schools, St. Croix County, 83 Wis. 2d 571, 266 N.W.2d 326 (1978).

Pre-Judgment Interest

As a general matter, Wisconsin does not allow claimants to collect pre-judgment interest on tort claims. However, if a party extends a settlement offer which is not accepted and the offering party recovers a judgment which is greater than or equal to the amount of the settlement offer, the offering party is entitled to interest at an annual rate of twelve percent determined from the date the offer was made until satisfaction of the judgment. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 807.01(4) (West 1994).

Patient Compensation Funds and Physician Insurance

Health care providers (principally physicians and hospitals) are required to pay a yearly assessment into the Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund (the "Fund") and provide proof of financial responsibility to the Commissioner of Insurance in the form of insurance, an approved plan of self-insurance, or a surety bond. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.23 (West 1995 & Supp. 1997). For occurrences prior to July 1, 1997, the prescribed limits are $400,000 for each occurrence and $1,000,000 in the annual aggregate. For occurrences after that date, the prescribed limits are $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $3,000,000 in the annual aggregate, although a phase-in exception allows per occurrence limits of $600,000 until July 1, 1999, and $800,000 until July 1, 2001. Health care providers are liable only to the extent of the limits of their insurance. Id.

The Fund provides compensation for claimants whose damages exceed the negligent health care provider's liability insurance. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.27 (West 1995 & Supp. 1997). The Fund must be joined as a party in the case, although the initial duty to defend is that of the underlying insurer or self-insurer. In certain large cases resulting from acts or omissions on or after May 25, 1995, the Fund can make periodic payments. Id.

Immunities

The State of Wisconsin has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent for political corporations, governmental subdivisions, and agencies, and for their agents and employees. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.80 (West 1997). Governmental subdivisions include cities and counties. Id. A claimant must notify the political subdivision within 180 days after discovery of an injury in order to bring an action based on medical malpractice. Id. Damages in a suit against the political subdivision cannot exceed $50,000. Id. Wisconsin governmental entities are immune from liability for punitive damages. Id. The presence of liability insurance does not constitute a waiver of these protections where the policy does not so state. Niedfelt v. Joint School Dist. No. 1, 23 Wis. 2d 641, 127 N.W.2d 800 (1964).

In order to pursue a medical malpractice action against a state employee, the claimant must notify the state of a possible suit within 180 days after the discovery of the injury, and the claimant cannot collect more than $250,000 in damages. Punitive damages are not recoverable for negligent acts by state employees. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.82 (West 1997).

Arbitration

Wisconsin has established a system of mediation panels to assist in the voluntary resolution of disputes between health care providers and patients or their families. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.42 (West 1995). The claimant must either request mediation before filing suit, in which case the statute of limitations is tolled and no court action can be commenced until the mediation is completed, Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.44 (West 1995), or request mediation within 15 days after filing of a complaint in court, in which case the lawsuit is stayed until mediation is complete. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 655.445 (West 1995). The findings and discussions of the mediation panel are inadmissible in a subsequent court action. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 904.085 (West Supp. 1997).


Copyright © 1990-1998 McCullough, Campbell & Lane. All Rights Reserved.


Juliet again I am not an attorney but do work with a med mal/ legal malpractice Lawfirm in chicago IL
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top