spunkee53 said:
thanks for your reply I am liable, but there is more to the situation. The wife was violent towards the husband and the agreement before they were married that they would not have any children. It wasnt like he was deserting his child he is not even sure the child is his and for his own welfare he left the marriage. Now as far as a modification cant it be in the state where the divorce is filled? He is not looking to get out of paying but needs it reduced since he is suffering from an illness. Please reply
thank you
My response:
I don't mean to sound dispassionate about your friend if he's ill. However, unless he's bedridden, and cannot move, and has to survive with a heart-lung machine, you just don't abandon family - - especially a child. What he's supposed to do is be part of that child's life. It doesn't matter how ferocious his wife was. That's just a "cop out". There's a child here. Hello ?
People get sick all the time. But, for a child, you move heaven and earth, and a mountain or two. Where's his paternal instinct ?
And, it doesn't matter if there was an "agreement"; the fact remains, there's a child of that union. A child who could use a father, if not a father-figure.
Obviously, he's already been determined to be the father of this child, or child support would not have been ordered. So, that excuse doesn't work either.
The court that has jurisdiction is where the child resides, not where the divorce was filed. People move all the time, and jurisdiction moves right along with the child - - if the controversy is about a child.
And yes, he is looking to get out of paying. That's why you brought up "giving up his rights" in your first post.
IAAL