• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

First step

  • Thread starter Thread starter mel678
  • Start date Start date

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

M

mel678

Guest
What is the name of your state? Georgia

I'm requesting information to avoid violating any laws. The CP stated I am the father of her child. I wanted to know what should I do to avoid from an abandonment warrantys being issued. I'm not sure if the child is mine and therefore I know a paternal test will be needed. I also want to be proactive in this situation. My situation is I have 2 kids with my wife which we live together in the same household. The child that was born was from an outside relationship. I assume resposibilty of my actions, therefore I wanted to know what I should do. Please send me as much information as possible
 


BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
If you were not married to the CP and did not sign the birth certificate or an acknowledgment of paternity, then she will have to 'name' you in any action to recover support. At that point you can demand a paternity test to determine whether or not you are the father. If you are found to be the father, then you have all rights and priviledges of fatherhood, including custody, visitation and yes, paying support.

HOWEVER, support will only be allowed from the time of any petition she files. So, at this point and until there is an action of some sort for legal determination, there isn't much you CAN or Should do.
 

king sol

Member
Another option would be to file for joint custody or visitation! Whether the situation was ideal or not, the child deserves to have his daddy in his life. And if the child is yours, you have hit the lottery. One more child to love!

$$$ is much too important in our society. The love of family and friends are the true riches in life.


So legally......you can iniciate the proceding to determine paternity, visitation, custody and child support. Most importantly you are claiming your legal right to be a father.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Except, at this point, the poster has no legal standing to do anything.

His only option is to wait until she files or he is contacted by children's services naming him the father. At THAT point, he has legal standing and only then.
 

king sol

Member
That is not correct any person regardless of relation has the option of petitioning the court for custodial rights. This is how so many grandparents have gained custody.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
king sol said:
That is not correct any person regardless of relation has the option of petitioning the court for custodial rights. This is how so many grandparents have gained custody.
I suggest you read troxel before you offer an opinion.

And even when grandparents do get visitation and/or custody, they have legal standing based on blood AND state statutes.

That is NOT the case in this situation. Because there is no paternity established and therefore, no legal standing. Under your incorrect assumption, I have as much right as the girl's parents to file for custody which is incorrect.

And the poster is the same. There is absolutely no legal standing in this case. And the poster is a legal stranger.
 

no$$4us

Member
father's rights

I am just wondering. Doesn't he have the right to know if he is the father If he suspects the child is his, can't he demand a test and to know if he can then ask for visitation? In other words can't he be pro-active so that he could establish himself and thus look like a more interested party when going to court rather than looking like a non-caring person?
 

king sol

Member
Attn: BB

You might want to do a litttle research of your own. A non-parent has the right to petition the court for custody of a child/chidren if they have "meaningful relationship" with the child and it is in the child's best interest.

Not much research needed, the first legal aid web site I went to!
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
king sol said:
Attn: BB

You might want to do a litttle research of your own. A non-parent has the right to petition the court for custody of a child/chidren if they have "meaningful relationship" with the child and it is in the child's best interest.

Not much research needed, the first legal aid web site I went to!
And I suggest you read this Poster's initial post. Nowhere in this thread has there been established a 'meaningful relationship'.

You have no conception of the law and I for one, am getting tired of your shotgun approach to responses here.

Does your membership mean so little to you that you would take the chance of a poster taking your advice, no matter how well-intentioned? I suggest you think about that.
 

nextwife

Senior Member
Instead of waiting, he should have his wife file for CS so at least the already born children must be considered when and if CS is calculated. Why should they suffer?

The biomom went and made a baby with married man and with a man who already had kids. You don't go making babies with guys you don't really know well enough to have been to their home unless you are ready to accept the consequences.

The already born kids need to be considered when the CS order is set and in order for that to happen, wife needs to file first.
 
Last edited:

king sol

Member
ATTN: BB

GA legal code 19-7-22

A father whether or not listed on the birth certificate has the right to file a legitimation action. This is not the same as a paternity hearing.

Look it up yourself http://www.ganet.org
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
19-7-22.
(a) A father of a child born out of wedlock may render the same legitimate by petitioning the superior court of the county of his residence, the county of residence of the child, or, if a petition for the adoption of the child is pending, the county in which the adoption petition is filed for legitimation of the child. Ok.. he has the right to petition to establish paternity....that was already said. In fact the OP said they knew they had to establish paternity.. not sure your arguement here.
(b) The petition shall set forth the name, age, and sex of the child, the name of the mother, and, if the father desires the name of the child to be changed, the new name. If the mother is alive, she shall have notice of the petition for legitimation.
(c) Upon the presentation and filing of the petition, the court may pass an order declaring the child to be legitimate and to be capable of inheriting from the father in the same manner as if born in lawful wedlock and specifying the name by which the child shall be known. again the case would have to be filed to legitimize the child before the child has rights to the father and vice versa
(d) A legitimation petition may be filed, pursuant to paragraphLIGITIMATION MUST be filed!! (2) of subsection (e) of Code Section 15-11-28, in the juvenile court of the county in which a deprivation proceeding regarding the child is pending.
(e) Except as provided by subsection (f) of this Code section, the court shall upon notice to the mother further establish such duty as the father may have to support the child, considering the facts and circumstances of the mother´s obligation of support and the needs of the child.
(f) After a petition for legitimation is granted, if a demand for a jury trial as to support has been properly filed by either parent, then the case shall be transferred to superior court for such jury trial. again, after LEGITIMATION HAS BEEN GRANTED.. must be filed for before it's granted
(g) Consistent with the purpose of subsection (a) of this Code section, whenever the Department of Human Resources petitions the superior court or other authorized trier of fact to establish paternity, the father may intervene to petition for the legitimation of the child born out of wedlock if the mother of the child consents to the filing of such legitimation petition. Upon the determination of paternity or if a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity has been made and has not been rescinded pursuant to Code Section 19-7-46.1, the court or trier of fact as a matter of law and pursuant to the provisions of Code Section 19-7-51 may enter an order or decree legitimating a child born out of wedlock, provided that such is in the best interest of the child. Issues of name change, visitation, and custody shall not be determined by the court until such time as a separate petition is filed by one of the parents or by the legal guardian of the child. Custody of the child shall remain in the mother until a court order is entered addressing the issue of custody.Do you see this? Mother has custody of child until it's addressed.. it's not addressed until paternity is established!

Like BB I'm about tired of this crap. I have to say I didn't see much problems out of you until you start giving out WRONG advice. This is a legal site and if you continue to give out illegal advice you're risking people taking that advice and doing ILLEGAL things which is TOTALLY against what this site is about. FIrst you need to actually LEARN the law... and then you need to make sure you understand it and follow it. AND yes this means knowing your place and staying in it!!

In once sentence you're telling the OP to go file custody and then you throw out this code that is about establishing paternity... UM.. HELLO.. figure out what BAD advice you're going to give out
 

king sol

Member
Get out the reading glasses................

BB's post #6 and #8 stating "legal fact" that his only option is to wait for the mother to name him as the father.

Sorry, once he goes through the above action, he is as entited as the mother is to custody of the child.

Believe it or not fathers have rights too!
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
Yeah Father's have rights but right now he IS NOT LEGALLY THE FATHER... YOU are the one telling him to go file for custody ... HE CAN NOT DO THIS...
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Mel, you have my answer. I will no longer return to this thread simply because I do not wish to muddy the waters for you by responding to idiot posts that fail to recognize the legal ramifications of your situation.

Regardless, any determination of paternity and resulting Child Support will ONLY be effective from the date of filing any petition for support. Therefore, if there is no petition you might want to be proactive and file on your own for paternity testing. If there IS a current petition, then you MUST demand a paternity test.

In any case, unless you were married to the woman during the time of conception or, as I said earlier, signed the BC or an acknowledgement of paternity, OR if the woman was married at the time of conception to another man, you are NOT the legal father. And ONLY a paternity test can determine you are.

At the very least, retain a local attorney. Sol won't be here very much longer so it's not worth my time to try and teach him a bit about the law.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top