• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Fuzzy Logic on Computer Exemption?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Svoboda
  • Start date Start date

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

S

Svoboda

Guest
What is the name of your state? Indiana

I am writing because I had a couple questions that I was hoping to have answered in regards to the FLSA, exempt status, and my current employment. More specifically, I feel as if I have been misclassified, and because of this, was not paid the correct wage.

Just to give you some background information, I was hired as an IT Specialist by my current employer in August 2002, with a starting salary of $28,800. From day one I was on call every other week for approximately three months until they fired my co-worker.

After she was fired, I was bumped up to $33,000, still labeled an IT Specialist and became on call 24/7. Then, in mid-2003, I was promoted to Systems Administrator, and my salary was bumped up to $40,000. The promotion was basically just to “correct” the incorrect job classification after I made a complaint to the Human Resources department and this is where I stand currently.

During my two years here, I have had many hours of “overtime” work as I am not permitted to do any maintenance, upgrades, etc, to our servers during normal business hours of 8am-5pm, which are my set daily work hours. There have been at least 6 emergencies that required me to work several 16 hour days alone with no extra compensation. Throw in my routine maintenance and after hours calls, and it quickly adds up... probably and average of 10-20 hours per week over 2 years.

I’ve recently been reading on the new FLSA updates after talking to some of my peers in similar positions that receive overtime. They have nearly identical job descriptions and perform the same duties as I do, yet receive overtime. I’ve read and re-read the computer professionals section nearly twenty times and I do not qualify for this exemption.

I have talked with my HR department and they claim that my position is exempt due to administrative tasks, as was my previous position. I think this is just an attempt to pigeon-hole me personally, as there is no way administrative duties is my primary job responsibility, nor do I spend anywhere near 50% doing these.

What is my proper chain of command to address this issue? Is this something I should retain a lawyer and file suit over? Any advice you can offer me on this would be gratefully accepted.
 


S

Svoboda

Guest
cbg, since you seem to be the resident expert, I would really love to hear your response. It would be MUCH appreciated.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
It would be next to impossible, particularly in light of the new laws, for me to determine whether you are or are not misclassified with the information available to me. IT jobs were very difficult to correctly classify under the old laws, and you really haven't given me enough detail to form a judgement under the new laws. What's more, the best I could offer even with more detail would be an informed guess - I could not say conclusively one way or another. However, if you believe you are misclassified, the best recourse would not be to hire a lawyer and file a lawsuit over something that you're not even certain is so, but to contact the US DOL, describe your job duties (not what your job description reads, but what you ACTUALLY do on a regular basis, if the two are different) and get an opinion from them. THEY would be the ones to file a complaint with, if indeed you are misclassified. And you don't need to pay them, like you would a lawyer.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top