What is the name of your state? Iowa
I have filed a case for return of a security deposit. The landlord inspected the house on two occassions and verbally ok'd it both times, (he wanted to do a second "more thorough" inspection)
2 weeks later we received a certified letter saying he's refusing to return our deposit because it was dirty and a couple latches were worn out, (normal wear and tear)
We confronted him with this as he'd ok'd it twice before and we would not have vacated nor returned the keys had he not ok'd it we would have rectified any problems. He threatened us with his "lawyer" so we filed small claims case against him.
The paperwork from the court stated he had 20 days to respond or it would be a default judgement, he did not respond until 22 days later. The clerk of court is refusing to file the judgement and saying we have to go to trial.
Does anyone know if there is a statute that says he has only 20 days and if so the statute number?
Also he verbally told us all was ok twice, then in a written signed by him letter stated that it was dirty so he was going to keep the deposit, then when answering our claim, he has now filed a counter claim for $4,000 (now the property is damaged by us even though it wasn't before as stated in his own letter)...... completely frivolous, is there any recourse for this??
We have complete video of the outside and inside of the house upon our vacating, it is imaculate. As well as him admitting on audio tape that he ok'd it and all was well initially. (this is legal in iowa as long as one side of the conversation knows the conversation is being recorded).
The two main questions here are is there a statute stating the defendant only has 20 days to respond, and is there any action to be taken against his inflated frivolous response? Punitive damages allowed??
Thank you for any help, any further information you need to know please ask and i'll provide short of names/location
Jason
I have filed a case for return of a security deposit. The landlord inspected the house on two occassions and verbally ok'd it both times, (he wanted to do a second "more thorough" inspection)
2 weeks later we received a certified letter saying he's refusing to return our deposit because it was dirty and a couple latches were worn out, (normal wear and tear)
We confronted him with this as he'd ok'd it twice before and we would not have vacated nor returned the keys had he not ok'd it we would have rectified any problems. He threatened us with his "lawyer" so we filed small claims case against him.
The paperwork from the court stated he had 20 days to respond or it would be a default judgement, he did not respond until 22 days later. The clerk of court is refusing to file the judgement and saying we have to go to trial.
Does anyone know if there is a statute that says he has only 20 days and if so the statute number?
Also he verbally told us all was ok twice, then in a written signed by him letter stated that it was dirty so he was going to keep the deposit, then when answering our claim, he has now filed a counter claim for $4,000 (now the property is damaged by us even though it wasn't before as stated in his own letter)...... completely frivolous, is there any recourse for this??
We have complete video of the outside and inside of the house upon our vacating, it is imaculate. As well as him admitting on audio tape that he ok'd it and all was well initially. (this is legal in iowa as long as one side of the conversation knows the conversation is being recorded).
The two main questions here are is there a statute stating the defendant only has 20 days to respond, and is there any action to be taken against his inflated frivolous response? Punitive damages allowed??
Thank you for any help, any further information you need to know please ask and i'll provide short of names/location
Jason