I live in California.
My 9-month lease was up last month, but me and three other roommates, T, C, and H, decided to renew the lease.
T lives in in his/her own room. I have my own room. C and H live in the living room together.
The rent went up 200 dollars. Before we renewed the lease, me, C, and H had a casual agreement that it would be about 50 per person after the increase in rent if we decided to stay. C said something like, "Oh, 200 isn't bad. It's only about 50 per person. So me and H will pay about 100 more." T didn't care how the rent increase was allocated.
About 3 weeks after we've signed the new lease, C and H come to me and tell me they think it's not fair, and that they should only pay about 60 more together, and that me and T should pay 65 and 75 respectively, since we have our own rooms.
Are C and H bound by law to pay what they've casually agreed to before?
My 9-month lease was up last month, but me and three other roommates, T, C, and H, decided to renew the lease.
T lives in in his/her own room. I have my own room. C and H live in the living room together.
The rent went up 200 dollars. Before we renewed the lease, me, C, and H had a casual agreement that it would be about 50 per person after the increase in rent if we decided to stay. C said something like, "Oh, 200 isn't bad. It's only about 50 per person. So me and H will pay about 100 more." T didn't care how the rent increase was allocated.
About 3 weeks after we've signed the new lease, C and H come to me and tell me they think it's not fair, and that they should only pay about 60 more together, and that me and T should pay 65 and 75 respectively, since we have our own rooms.
Are C and H bound by law to pay what they've casually agreed to before?