• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Is my interpretation correct?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

WittyUserName

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ID

Even after reading these forums almost daily for the last two years, I recognize that I am a layperson...so could someone make sure I am understanding my legalese correctly?

There's been a Motion for Contempt filed for nonpayment of CS. Dad is several months behind, and has never paid his court-ordered share of child care since the original support order was filed in 2004. We just finished working out custody/visitation, and updating the CS as well to reflect current incomes for both Dad and myself.

This is what came back from Dad on the MfC:
"He was unable to comply with the court order at the time of the alleged violation.
He lacks the present ability to comply with the court order.
Mom should be estopped from bringing the pending motion in light of her statements/actions and/or failure to act.
That the motion should be dismissed based on applicable statutes of limitation."

The Idaho statute for limitations re: cs is as follows:
5-245.Actions to collect child support arrearages. An action or proceeding to collect child support arrearages must be commenced within five (5) years after the child reaches the age of majority or within five (5) years after the child’s death, if death occurs before the child reaches majority. An action or proceeding under this section shall include, but is not limited to, execution on the judgment, order to show cause, garnishment, income withholding, income tax offset or lottery prize offset.

Kiddo is about to turn 8, so we are nowhere near age of majority. And according to information from the trial we just finished, Dad makes over $50K per year, is not married, and has no other children. This response makes no sense to me, but maybe I'm not interpreting correctly?

Thanks for your time and advice, FA forum.
 


Zephyr

Senior Member
Who wrote that? And clarify MfC please.

I'm thinking they (dad) are throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping something sticks because there is nothing I read in the statute quoted that applies to your situation.
 

WittyUserName

Senior Member
Dad's atty wrote it (I guess) in his response to my Motion for Contempt. MfC was my shorthand for that. I have no idea what they mean by statute of limitations in terms of this case.
I think you may be right about the spaghetti thing. Dad has a right to ask for a hearing, and he has, but it doesn't seem like he has a solid reason to do so. And meanwhile the costs keep on keepin' on...so I will too, clearly.
 

garrula lingua

Senior Member
The atty is simply listing the most common defenses to a contempt motion.
It doesn't mean he can prove up any of these defenses.
 

WittyUserName

Senior Member
Thanks for the response, Garrula. I thought maybe that was the case. It looks directly copied from the rules of civil procedure, actually - so I'll just wait and see what happens next. I appreciate your time.
 

WittyUserName

Senior Member
Little dilemma - advise?

Headed to court (in original state) for hearing tomorrow morning on Dad's nonpayment of CS. Dad is still quite behind - has not paid even the base CS since my last post nor made any attempt at the arrears. I am at the airport, waiting to board plane, when I get an urgent text from Dad who wants to know if I can talk, he has a solution. This, not 24 hours after emailing to tell me he knew the terms of the order but still could not pay it and maintain his living arrangements.

Should I even respond? Or just wait til tomorrow?
 

Silverplum

Senior Member
Headed to court (in original state) for hearing tomorrow morning on Dad's nonpayment of CS. Dad is still quite behind - has not paid even the base CS since my last post nor made any attempt at the arrears. I am at the airport, waiting to board plane, when I get an urgent text from Dad who wants to know if I can talk, he has a solution. This, not 24 hours after emailing to tell me he knew the terms of the order but still could not pay it and maintain his living arrangements.

Should I even respond? Or just wait til tomorrow?

I can't say, Witty. I don't know what's "smart" in this instance.

But I wish you safe travel and justice. :):):)
 

WittyUserName

Senior Member
Well, interesting...

Dad didn't show up. Judge was not happy. Warrant's in progress. Dad's hounding me with "Let's Make A Deal" texts.

And I was all dressed up, which takes a lot of effort when you are this far into a pregnancy...dang.
 

cyjeff

Senior Member
So...

Dad found his ass was in a crack and started the "let's talk about this" game.

Fun.

Not so much for him, of course.
 

Isis1

Senior Member
Well, interesting...

Dad didn't show up. Judge was not happy. Warrant's in progress. Dad's hounding me with "Let's Make A Deal" texts.

And I was all dressed up, which takes a lot of effort when you are this far into a pregnancy...dang.

oh man....i would have shown up in a muumuu. i hate being pregnant. i'm not a happy pregnant person type of gal.

i'd ignore dad. too little...too late.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top