Judge hallucinated date on exhibit and every judge overlooks it ,why?

[0p3ns0urc3s]

The exhibits didn't have a date. The dates were testified to. But the judge claims a physical date was on the defendants exhibit even though the counsel for defendant states the exhibits date was only testified to.

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/p...rectory=2024-1462\DocketItems&source=DL_Clerk

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/clerk/ecms/#/caseinfo/2024/1462What is the name of your state?

 

[quincy]

The exhibits didn't have a date. The dates were testified to. But the judge claims a physical date was on the defendants exhibit even though the counsel for defendant states the exhibits date was only testified to.

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/p...rectory=2024-1462\DocketItems&source=DL_Clerk

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/clerk/ecms/#/caseinfo/2024/1462What is the name of your state?

What is your state name and what is your question?

Are/were you a party in this case?

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

Ohio. I want to know how often this occurs and if anything can be done.

I was plaintiff. I brought the case. I submitted an exhibit which did not have a physical date but I testified to the date.
Defendant submitted an exhibit which did not have a physical date but they testified to the date.
The judge hallucinated a date on the defendants exhibit but not mine. Per her findings of fact and conclusions of law, she wrote that their exhibit was dated and mine wasn't.
But neither exhibit was dated as confirmed by opposing counsel. Every judge is refusing to deal with this hallucination which I think is plain error because you only need to read the judgment decision and look at the exhibits, both of which are public and available to see plainly.

 

[quincy]

Ohio. I want to know how often this occurs and if anything can be done.

I was plaintiff. I brought the case. I submitted an exhibit which did not have a physical date but I testified to the date.
Defendant submitted an exhibit which did not have a physical date but they testified to the date.
The judge hallucinated a date on the defendants exhibit but not mine. Per her findings of fact and conclusions of law, she wrote that their exhibit was dated and mine wasn't.
But neither exhibit was dated as confirmed by opposing counsel. Every judge is refusing to deal with this hallucination which I think is plain error because you only need to read the judgment decision and look at the exhibits, both of which are public and available to see plainly.

Are you now looking for a reason to appeal the court’s finding?

How vital were these dates to the final decision?

Your second link doesn’t work.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

I have already appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.
The problem is the judges sweep this under the rug. Please read my motion.

For plain error, you need to have something obviously wrong that denies a right.
Well, it is plainly obvious the Municipal Court judge hallucinated a date on an exhibit and everyone is avoiding the error. Please read my motion.

 

[quincy]

Your second link doesn’t work.

The judge said that a photo from the defendant’s phone was dated even though no date appeared on the printed photo that was introduced as evidence.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

Are you now looking for a reason to appeal the court’s finding?

How vital were these dates to the final decision?

Also, the date is the reason the judge stated it couldn't be shown that the car was involved in an accident. It was the pinnacle of the whole case!
The judge writes in her findings of fact that, "[The defendant] had photos of the car dated the day after the alleged incident and no damage is shown."

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

Your second link doesn’t work.

Here is a link:
Explaining the Judge Date Hallucination

 

[quincy]

The judge said that a dated photo was on the defendant’s phone, even though the photo presented as evidence in court did not show a date.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

Your second link doesn’t work.

The judge said that a photo from the defendant’s phone was dated even though no date appeared on the printed photo that was introduced as evidence.

EXACTLY! It wasn't dated. But she said it was dated. In the document submitted to court (https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:6ea5cbb7-2b14-4d2d-9e6f-1bb5978ea435), I show this. It is plainly available to see!
Why does no judge say anything about it?

Edit: This is what the judge says about my photo that wasn't dated.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

The judge said that a dated photo was on the defendant’s phone, even though the photo presented as evidence in court did not show a date.

The judge said the defendants photo was dated for the day after the alleged incident and no damage is shown.

However, the photo was not dated for the day after the incident!
There's no date on the photo!

 

[quincy]

EXACTLY! It wasn't dated. But she said it was dated. In the document submitted to court (https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:6ea5cbb7-2b14-4d2d-9e6f-1bb5978ea435), I show this. It is plainly available to see!
Why does no judge say anything about it?

It appears that the judge saw a dated photo on the phone. The date just did not show up on the print out that was introduced.

Why didn’t you have dated photos of the vehicles after the accident?

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

It appears that the judge saw a dated photo on the phone. The date just did not show up on the print out that was introduced.

Why didn’t you have dated photos of the vehicles after the accident?

NO, you're confusing them. I showed the date of MY EXHIBITS on my phone. The defendants did not.
I thought you could just testify to the dates! That's what the Defendant did!

If the date did not show up on the print out then how is it dated for the day after the alleged incident? Please tell me how.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

It appears that the judge saw a dated photo on the phone. The date just did not show up on the print out that was introduced.

Why didn’t you have dated photos of the vehicles after the accident?

The exhibit D is EXACTLY what opposing counsel submitted to the court. So how is it dated when no date is shown?

I showed the dates of my exhibits on my phone. The judge still did not consider my exhibits dated.
She literally hallucinated a date on the defendants exhibits but not mine even though I showed proof on my phone, per her own words!
What can I do?

 

[quincy]

NO, you're confusing them. I showed the date of MY EXHIBITS on my phone. The defendants did not.
I thought you could just testify to the dates! That's what the Defendant did!

If the date did not show up on the print out then how is it dated for the day after the alleged incident? Please tell me how.

Ahhh. You’re right. I misunderstood. And I think I now understand your argument.

As to what you can do at this point, you are doing it. You are appealing the court’s decision.

I suggest you don’t say that the judge “hallucinated.” Find a better way to state your argument.