Judge hallucinated date on exhibit and every judge overlooks it ,why?

[Zigner]

Why is this so hard to answer? Plenty of you call it a mistake but none of you answer.

I'll stipulate that the photo is undated.

It doesn't change what you've been told here.

 

[quincy]

I'll stipulate that the photo is undated.

It doesn't change what you've been told here.

The photo alone does not prove or disprove anything.

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

Did you ever investigate any vehicle repairs made by your defendant? If not, why not?

I did. They said they hadn't. But larger cars don't often have damage in minor incidents with smaller cars. The clear coat may be scuffed but that may only be visible to a trained eye.

Seriously, from what I read of your case, I saw nothing that proved the defendant caused damage to your vehicle. What you presented was inadequate. You lost for that reason.

You wouldn't see it. The evidence was my testimony. Doesn't testimony count as evidence? Yes.

This thread has been reported for moderator review.

For what reasons?

 

[0p3ns0urc3s]

The photo alone does not prove or disprove anything.

Neither does testimony that a child was in a walking boot. People drive all the time with those because they can't get time off work especially if the injury occurred outside of work.

 

[quincy]

I did. They said they hadn't. But larger cars don't often have damage in minor incidents with smaller cars. The clear coat may be scuffed but that may only be visible to a trained eye.



You wouldn't see it. The evidence was my testimony. Doesn't testimony count as evidence? Yes.

Your testimony was not found as credible as the testimony of your defendant. And your investigation fell short.