• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Just an FYI to those who want to move

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

sipa

Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?

I work for a utility company in NJ and DE and had an interesting call today.

My customer today called to turn off her electric which struck me as odd since it's only been on about a month.

She continued to expand the story (you might be surprised what I hear in a day) she stated that the judge had forced her to move back to PA so that the kids could be enrolled in school by their 9/8 start date, that she had moved out of state with her three kids with out consent from her ex husband.

The judge gave her 10 days to vacate her current DE residence and be back in her school system and area with in that time period, or surrender the children to her ex. She lost her 1000 security deposit on her new place and need another 1200 security deposit for her new PA residence. A foolish move that could have been avoided has cost her thousands in relocation costs not to mention she quit her job in PA and was now employed in DE and has to make the commute everyday until this is resolved.

I just wanted to put this out here so those who are asking if they can move with out consent of the other party realize that there is a bigger picture, these kids have been uprooted to a new home, settled, ready to go to a new school, and then ripped out of their new home, and put back in their old school. I am sure from the sounds of it things are not real friendly right now between the parents, so the kids have that to deal with as well.

The judge can and evidently will bring you back. I thought this was interesting...
 


wileybunch

Senior Member
Right. Except judge wasn't making HER come back, he was making the KIDS come back. They would have lived with Dad if Mom did not hightail it back. Did Mom act bitter about it or did she seem to accept she messed up?
 

sipa

Member
Right. Except judge wasn't making HER come back, he was making the KIDS come back. They would have lived with Dad if Mom did not hightail it back. Did Mom act bitter about it or did she seem to accept she messed up?


Oh no he did make Mom move back Dad was in a different school system and the judge advised her to have them back in THEIR original school system by schools start.

Was she bitter....ummm yes and no, she sounded busted..
 

sipa

Member
No you stated this:




Mom could have given custody to dad and stayed. I would assume the judge said the original so t he kids wouldn't have to get ready to start yet another school. It would make sense to make her go back to where she was so that dad could get the same amount of visitation in be involved in the child's life and the children wouldn't be uprooted any more than they already have.


exactly she was to have them back- or surrender to Dad. The point of this is to let people know the judge will push back when YOU don't do what you are suppose to in regards to moving.

Period*** so when someone is fighting your advice send them here to this post....its real it happens is my point..
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top