• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

lost art law?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

justalayman

Senior Member
For example, there was a case (possibly out of Nebraska, but if memory serves I think it was Utah) where items were hidden or "lost" in a house that was sold and the courts involved in the ownership dispute ruled that the items found in the house by the new owners belonged to the previous owner/home seller and not the new owner/purchaser of the home. So I suppose it is possible, if the artwork was part of a group of items found in a studio/building that was sold, and the purchaser of the studio/building decided to sell what was found, ownership of the items could come into question.
there was an issue to the east somewhere (might have been Ohio) where money was found in a house. It too was ruled it belonged to the prior owners of the house as it was not abandoned property but simply misplaced property. Basically there was no intent to convey title of the money so it remained the property of the person that put it there.
 


quincy

Senior Member
there was an issue to the east somewhere (might have been Ohio) where money was found in a house. It too was ruled it belonged to the prior owners of the house as it was not abandoned property but simply misplaced property. Basically there was no intent to convey title of the money so it remained the property of the person that put it there.

There have been several cases sprinkled throughout the country that center on lost, abandoned or misplaced property.

The case I was thinking of (and it could have been Ohio although my feeling is it was farther west) involved items hidden behind the walls of a house by the original owner of the house. The items were discovered when the new owners of the house renovated the home. The original owner had died and the heirs were the ones who sold the house but then the heirs claimed ownership of the found items.

I can't remember all of the details (obviously :)), but I think there was a thread on this forum that dealt with this. Maybe in the Real Estate section of the forum?

Anyway, it is always important to know all facts. I even hesitate to absolutely say that the artist retains the copyrights, without knowing all that is involved.

If HuskerT is looking for a clearer answer, he should probably sit down with an attorney in his area to review all of the known facts.


(as a note: for me, Ohio is to the south ;))
 
Last edited:
T

Tony23

Guest
What is the name of your state, HuskerT?

The original artist could potentially claim rights but, after 19 years, the odds are slim that the artist could show he is rightful the owner of the work (ie, that he did not sell it or give it away a long time ago).

It depends on all facts.

Yeah, I think you're right.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top