• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Music library agreement offer???

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

RaTunes

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S.law)? California


A music library has offered me and my brother an agreement for master use/sync licensing of a recording we did back in the 1970s so as to add it to their library to present to TV and film producers for soundtrack usage.

The agreement is basically a 50/50 split on everything, except they take no publishing. However, it's for 7 years. Seems very long.

Most libraries I've compared data on only go for 2 to 3 years and then renew. But It is non-exclusive though, so I guess I can live with that part.

But my main concern is the sub-publishing aspect which says it is a 50/50 split. I'm okay with that, but at the end of that statement it says "MINUS COSTS."

Is this a legal phrase of art that's slipped in that leaves the situation open for abuse and manipulation of so-called "costs" during accounting so that there could conceivably be no "50%" for us??? Shouldn't standard and ordinary costs that normally occur be delineated or something that doesn't leave it so open to undermining our 50%?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
 



Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top