cacreditor
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ca
I am a creditor in a chapter 7 case. the case was closed as a no asset case.
I am still in disbelief that the bankruptcy trustee and judge would rubber stamp this as a no asset case. the debtor was able to get a complete discharge, keep all of his inventory, 3 cars and whatever monies he had in the bank. what is wrong with the judicial system? all a debtor needs to do is misrepresent his assets and "appear" insolvent.
a few months later I received a notice of possible dividend? what is this? how is this possible when they ruled as a no asset case? is it divided equally among the creditors? how is that decided?
I am a creditor in a chapter 7 case. the case was closed as a no asset case.
I am still in disbelief that the bankruptcy trustee and judge would rubber stamp this as a no asset case. the debtor was able to get a complete discharge, keep all of his inventory, 3 cars and whatever monies he had in the bank. what is wrong with the judicial system? all a debtor needs to do is misrepresent his assets and "appear" insolvent.
a few months later I received a notice of possible dividend? what is this? how is this possible when they ruled as a no asset case? is it divided equally among the creditors? how is that decided?