Momto1yrold
Member
What is the name of your state? NY
Ive posted here a few times.
I have a question About the decision in the modification case.
They didnt change the current order but they modified for the 3 months (from time of surgery to time of him going back to doctor Feb 15th to May 22nd). They said he is only responsible for $25 a month support obligation so does that mean just support, is he also liable for the add ons listed in the support order (extras such as % of insurance, % of daycare) or just $25 a month in total no additional expenses??
The way the findings of fact is listed is odd to me, I dont understand some of it. It said he received "$1600 in WC during that time which is below poverty level" (im not sure if the judge was thinking ex only got $1600 for the whole 3 months or what). But ex said his "first check was $1600" not in total. He was getting $400 a week for comp. When he went back in end of April to work he was getting $300 a wk. The $25 a month is not even close to 17% of his pay at $300 a wk. But like I said I am satisfied with decision the judge made.
Ive posted here a few times.
I have a question About the decision in the modification case.
They didnt change the current order but they modified for the 3 months (from time of surgery to time of him going back to doctor Feb 15th to May 22nd). They said he is only responsible for $25 a month support obligation so does that mean just support, is he also liable for the add ons listed in the support order (extras such as % of insurance, % of daycare) or just $25 a month in total no additional expenses??
The way the findings of fact is listed is odd to me, I dont understand some of it. It said he received "$1600 in WC during that time which is below poverty level" (im not sure if the judge was thinking ex only got $1600 for the whole 3 months or what). But ex said his "first check was $1600" not in total. He was getting $400 a week for comp. When he went back in end of April to work he was getting $300 a wk. The $25 a month is not even close to 17% of his pay at $300 a wk. But like I said I am satisfied with decision the judge made.