• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

question on prosecution's burden of proof of INTENT

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

javajoe7

Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA but this is a federal case concerning identity theft.
As i continue to research my case, i forgot the main thing a prosecutor has to prove which is INTENT.
Correct me if i am wrong, but i think at least one of the jurors will directly relate to my situation which is during our countrys recessions i was out of work and couldnt pay my bills and my credit went bad and our country has no help or solution to this (well, they either want u to live in a shelter, the projects, or give u 200 a month in welfare which is outrageous as its at least 5 times less than the poverty level)( our country should be ashamed of itself)
SO
my INTENT was to create a new or synthetic identity JUST SO I COULD LIVE!
I never INTENTED to hurt another person.
just to note, when i show the jury (if the prosecutor produces it), the bank or credit applications, i will show them that OVER HALF of the information
doesnt match with the other person. the address, phone number, email address, and job/career status all were wrong BUT due to the bank not doing due diligence AT ALL they approved them. just to note, in the bank application case, they have a higher burden of due diligence as they have to comply with the PAtriot Act and besides the 4 identitfiers i mentioned above that were wrong, they also require a drivers license number which was also wrong. Remember im just mnentioning this gross negiligence just to show that the banks/credit card compnaies dont care abougt identity theft victims, they just want that instant credit business. for things to ever change, the banks need to do their part
JUST REMEMEBER MY QUESTION HERE IS ABOUT INTENT
THAT MY INTENT WAS TO CREATE A NEW IDENTITY (and if the banks/credit card companys were negligent enough to just approve and add it to someones credit file THAT LIVES NOT EVEN IN THE SAME STATE, then thats their fault)
AND JUST WOULD LIKE SOME PEOPLE HERE TO AGREE THAT AT LEAST ONE JUROR HAS HAD THE SAME SITUATION AKA LOST JOB, CREDIT GOES BAD, COUNTRY HAS NO ANSWER DURING A RECESSION ( or even now for that matter)
 


javajoe7

Member
hey Zigner

this is complete new issue, plus people were rude on that thread, not sticking to the question. just seeing if i can get new perspectives
so any comments/advice anyone
 

tranquility

Senior Member
Sometimes people act poorly here. Sometimes, I act poorly here. Sorry.

However, what Zinger said. On long experience, any other rule causes chaos and bad feelings on the part of the participants who are working on separate and additional facts.

Keep your questions in one thread.
 

Antigone*

Senior Member
Sometimes people act poorly here. Sometimes, I act poorly here. Sorry.

However, what Zinger said. On long experience, any other rule causes chaos and bad feelings on the part of the participants who are working on separate and additional facts.

Keep your questions in one thread.

aaahhh boy. You both had to go an encourge this guy, huh:rolleyes::p:p

Break out the tin foil hats!!!
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top