• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Question regarding Alabama code 36-21-7

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Justin12324

Junior Member
Can someone please shed some light on me about the following state code and answer a few of my questions?

1) If I am hired by another law enforcement agency after the 24 month period, do they still have to pay the reimbursement total?

2) Also, does this only apply going immediately from one agency to the next? Or in my case; I left the original hiring police department and worked several different companies over a 17 month period before being hired by another agency. Does this "24 month period" still apply?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

The code states:

In those instances in which a law enforcement officer, certified corrections officer, fire protection personnel, or firefighter of any municipality, county, sheriff’s department, fire district, or the state is employed by the State of Alabama, any county, sheriff’s department, fire district, or another municipality, within 24 months after completing the training requirements mandated by Article 3 (commencing with Section 36-21-40) of this chapter, or by Chapter 32 (commencing with Section 36-32-1), the total expense of the training, including, but not limited to, salary paid during training, transportation costs paid to the trainee for travel to and from the training facility, room, board, tuition, overtime paid to other employees who fill in for the trainee during his or her absence, and any other related training expenses, shall be reimbursed to the municipality, county, fire district, or the state which paid for the training. The municipality, county, fire district, or the state which paid for the training shall submit an itemized sworn statement to the new employer of the law enforcement officer, fire protection personnel, or firefighter, as the case may be, shall demand payment thereof, and may enforce collection of the obligation through civil remedies and procedures. The term “law enforcement officer”, shall have the same meaning as in Section 36-21-40 and the term “fire protection personnel and firefighter”, shall have the same meaning as in Section 36-32-1.
 


FlyingRon

Senior Member
If more than 24 months pass since the training before you take the new job, it doesn't apply.
It matters not if you work other jobs (or go unemployed) within the 24 months. It only matters that you were trained by one department (under the provisions of the statute) and you start workign for a different one before 24 months is out.
 

Justin12324

Junior Member
Thank you for the response, FlyingRon! What if the original hiring department tells the new hiring department something completely different? For instance; That they must pay the reimbursemt regardless of the 24 month period.
 

quincy

Senior Member
... What if the original hiring department tells the new hiring department something completely different? For instance; That they must pay the reimbursemt regardless of the 24 month period.

Why would the original hiring department do that?
 

Justin12324

Junior Member
That's a great question.. Why do people do half of the crazy things that they do? I am in no way saying that they would. I am only speaking hypothetically and trying to reach out to learn more about the steps I should take in case that were to happen.

Why would the original hiring department do that?
 

quincy

Senior Member
That's a great question.. Why do people do half of the crazy things that they do? I am in no way saying that they would. I am only speaking hypothetically and trying to reach out to learn more about the steps I should take in case that were to happen.

Ahhh.

Well, if the original hiring department knows the law, your hypothetical will remain just that. If they don't know it, and should your imagined scenario come to pass, I am sure the other department will educate them on the law.




(as a note: I am assuming what you posted of the Alabama Code is correct and complete - I didn't check)
 

Justin12324

Junior Member
Ahhh.

Well, if the original hiring department knows the law, your hypothetical will remain just that. If they don't know it, and should your imagined scenario come to pass, I am sure the other department will educate them on the law.




(as a note: I am assuming what you posted of the Alabama Code is correct and complete - I didn't check)

I appreciate the response, Quincy. Yes, the code is correct. It was just a straight copy and paste from ALCode. I guess we will let it play out over the next few days and see what happens. I was just a little stressed out about it and was just searching for a little insight on the situation. I have my reasons as to why I am stressed due to this particular department doing such a thing like previously stated. But I just didn't want to get all into that on the forum.
 

quincy

Senior Member
... I guess we will let it play out over the next few days and see what happens. I was just a little stressed out about it and was just searching for a little insight on the situation. I have my reasons as to why I am stressed due to this particular department doing such a thing like previously stated. But I just didn't want to get all into that on the forum.

We tend not to address hypotheticals on this forum. Too many variables.

If you DO find an issue arising over training reimbursement, you are welcome to post back and we can try to help you at that time. Based on the little you have said, however, it doesn't appear to me that you have much reason to worry that the departments are ignorant of the laws that govern them.

Good luck.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top