abstract99
Senior Member
What is the name of your state? Az
This is Abstracts wife. I just thought I would give you an update on his court today. He got out about an hour or so ago. Basically, from what he has told me on the phone, Mom perjured herself. Her statements in her disposition were not the same as what she said in court.
In her disposition she stated that she did not send the kids for the past year because she thought they would be in danger here. In court she told the judge that she contacted Dad back in February stating that he could have visitation but that he never responded and this hearing was the firs that she had heard that he wanted that time.
DH brought up that he was having trouble with visitation because mom claimed ignorance about the parenting plan. The judge entered a new plan right in court today. He started to award him visitation this Fall but then mom said that she had plans to travel out of town during that time DH did not argue with it because he really wanted this Christmas. So the judge goes, “ok then he gets this winter then” and mom said that she had plans to travel THEN as well. So the judge basically looked at her and asked when she would be able to find time in her busy schedule for the kids to spend time with dad. She replied that she didn’t see it possible and that she didn’t think that dad should get visitation. THE JUDGE WENT OFF ON HER. NOW… DH has this winter, next spring, next summer, next fall and next winter again. Not only that but mom has to pay for all of the transportation PLUS reimburse us the $3,500 in airfare that we have spent over the past year to get the visitation enforced which she must do by tomorrow night.
Anyways, thanks for the help with the case, it helped him out a lot.
This is Abstracts wife. I just thought I would give you an update on his court today. He got out about an hour or so ago. Basically, from what he has told me on the phone, Mom perjured herself. Her statements in her disposition were not the same as what she said in court.
In her disposition she stated that she did not send the kids for the past year because she thought they would be in danger here. In court she told the judge that she contacted Dad back in February stating that he could have visitation but that he never responded and this hearing was the firs that she had heard that he wanted that time.
DH brought up that he was having trouble with visitation because mom claimed ignorance about the parenting plan. The judge entered a new plan right in court today. He started to award him visitation this Fall but then mom said that she had plans to travel out of town during that time DH did not argue with it because he really wanted this Christmas. So the judge goes, “ok then he gets this winter then” and mom said that she had plans to travel THEN as well. So the judge basically looked at her and asked when she would be able to find time in her busy schedule for the kids to spend time with dad. She replied that she didn’t see it possible and that she didn’t think that dad should get visitation. THE JUDGE WENT OFF ON HER. NOW… DH has this winter, next spring, next summer, next fall and next winter again. Not only that but mom has to pay for all of the transportation PLUS reimburse us the $3,500 in airfare that we have spent over the past year to get the visitation enforced which she must do by tomorrow night.
Anyways, thanks for the help with the case, it helped him out a lot.
Thanks for coming back to update everyone~ It helps to show that courts are not tolerant of that kind of behavior. 