What is the name of your state? NM
I've read parts of the tax treaty between the US and Belgium. This is some tough reading. I need some practical advice on where to go for advice. Should I try to find a Belgian accountant that can accommodate US taxes, or should I seek out a US accountant who knows how to file in Belgium?
The advice of the employer is to use their accountant to file in Belgium (they offer this as a benefit), and to use a US accountant to file in the US. This sounds like terrible advice to me, because neither account will be able to advise on how to best exploit the tax treaty.
Another question in particular is that there is a significant tax savings vehicle in Europe, such that earnings are wired directly to a foreign holding company (which is based neither in the US or Belgium), and the worker is a shareholder who is paid in dividends on an as-needed basis. Tax is paid on the foreign dividends, but not on the amount sitting in the foreign company (until it's withdrawn). This is a legitimate way to greatly reduce tax liability for Europeans. However, once the US tax liability and tax treaty are considered, the foreign holding company arrangement may not pay off -- it may even worsen the situation enough to make the traditional employee/employer arrangement the best option. Does anyone know which arrangement is better overall, with both countries accounted for?
I've read parts of the tax treaty between the US and Belgium. This is some tough reading. I need some practical advice on where to go for advice. Should I try to find a Belgian accountant that can accommodate US taxes, or should I seek out a US accountant who knows how to file in Belgium?
The advice of the employer is to use their accountant to file in Belgium (they offer this as a benefit), and to use a US accountant to file in the US. This sounds like terrible advice to me, because neither account will be able to advise on how to best exploit the tax treaty.
Another question in particular is that there is a significant tax savings vehicle in Europe, such that earnings are wired directly to a foreign holding company (which is based neither in the US or Belgium), and the worker is a shareholder who is paid in dividends on an as-needed basis. Tax is paid on the foreign dividends, but not on the amount sitting in the foreign company (until it's withdrawn). This is a legitimate way to greatly reduce tax liability for Europeans. However, once the US tax liability and tax treaty are considered, the foreign holding company arrangement may not pay off -- it may even worsen the situation enough to make the traditional employee/employer arrangement the best option. Does anyone know which arrangement is better overall, with both countries accounted for?