• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Violent Persons Registry

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

gangstalking

Junior Member
Occupational Health and Safety

http://www.wcb.pe.ca/photos/original/wcb_wpviolence.pdf
The Canadian Center of Occupational Health and Safety

Unless otherwise prohibited by law, the duty to inform workers under subsection (1) includes a duty to provide information related to the risk of violence from persons who have a history of violent behavior and who may be encountered by a worker in the course of his or her work.

Remember that Jane Clift was placed on the U.K. version of this list.

Workers have the ’ right to know ‘ all risks and safe work procedures associated with the job. This may involve identifying individuals with a history of unpredictable or violent behavior.

People have the right to defend themselves if they are going to be placed on a list.


The identity of the person and the nature of the risk must be given to staff likely to come into contact with that person. While workers have the right to know the risks, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed.

Your identify and information can be shared with thousands upon thousands in a big city. America and other countries have similar reporting requirements and listings. Many targets have reported that their information is being shared across many countries. I think the community needs a lawyer who can help put together some insightful F.O.I.A. about who has been getting targeted. Age, Race, Gender. Then in the U.K. you can write to request your info stops getting shared.

The scary thing about these lists is that it's other people's words and interpretations, if they are wrong, malicious, or just report false or misinterpreted information, then you are in deeper muck than you started out in. The Gang Stalking comes in via the illegal harassment that is happening under the course of these activities to deliberately try to make the targets look crazy.
 


cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
It may have escaped your attention, but Canada is not a part of the US. Where are the links to the AMERICAN lists you are so certain exist?
 

YoureNeverWrong

Junior Member
I don't see why there has to be a violent person's registry in the US to facilitate organized stalking here. We've got neighborhood watches which lead up to USAonWatch.org (a front for Homeland Security), we've got police informant networks, we've got good ole boy networks and secret societies who're accountable to nobody... lots of people with time on their hands to mess with others and the ethics of a rat.
 

gangstalking

Junior Member
All countries have the same reporting standards.

It may have escaped your attention, but Canada is not a part of the US. Where are the links to the AMERICAN lists you are so certain exist?

Did not escape my attention, but Canada, America and other countries have the exact reporting, documenting, and list keeping under Occupational Health and Safety.

The point was to show such lists do exist. They are not called Violent Person's Registries in these countries, but the process is still the same. Innocent people getting on these lists, some being targeted by employers and others.

The question is the process for review. What I am seeing is a lack of oversight. The Targets do not see the evidence against them, and the community goes into hypervigilance, vigilante mode. Electronic monitoring/electronic means are then used on targets, when they try to explain what's happening to them, it sounds like they have had a mental break down, but that is not the case.

The lack of oversight, targets not seeing the evidence used to brand them, and a need for a clear procedure to be reviewed or have their files cleared is needed.

Targets when the harassment starts and they go to lawyers, doctors, the police, for help are ignored. People would rather believe them to be mentally ill, vs being driven from their communities due to false flagging and labels.

This would not be that bad, but I have single women complaining of sexual assaults, apparently being put on such lists, makes them easy targets for such practices. Some are afraid to go to the police, because of how they are being labeled.

I have had one parent complain that someone broke in and added water to her child's diabetic medication. Another says his young child was electronically harassed by the mosquito device, he could never figure out why the child would start screaming about loud pitch noises till much later.

Mosquito’ devices which emit high-pitched whine to help disperse teenagers from street corners could be banned by the European Union
on the grounds that they infringe children’s human rights.

Fun little things like this are being done, but most targets don't know how to explain what is happening so complaints are dismissed.

The question again is, since such lists exist, what is the process for review, or examining the evidence that is being used against Targets. At least they have a right to see their files, and what has been said, or misrepresented against them.

Suggestions for the right type of lawyer, or Freedom of information requests would be helpful.
 

Proserpina

Senior Member
Did not escape my attention, but Canada, America and other countries have the exact reporting, documenting, and list keeping under Occupational Health and Safety.

And I can tell you that such OHS reporting practices differ greatly between certain countries.

I'm English. Lived there most of my life. I have direct knowledge of this.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
You have yet to prove that such lists exist. Since the rest of us deny the existence of these lists, why do you expect that we would be able to give you the process for review of a list that only you seem to know about?

I say again, post a link to an AMERICAN list of such type, and maybe you'll get an answer. The rest of us don't have a clue what lists you are talking about.

FYI, I am (or have been) an employer, and I have NEVER used, seen, or even heard about such a list being used for employment purposes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top