divgradcurl said:
you need to make sure that the product doesn't have a U.S. trademark associated with it...
Divgradcurl,
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. Allow me to be clearer in my previous statement. The design patent in registered with the Hague system of international deposit of industrial designs. Since the Hague system is applicable among the countries party to The Hague Agreement and the U.S. is not one, I can manufacture the toy legally in the United States…..right?
It is very funny that you mention the trademark issue. The company that manufactures the toy and the toy is called the same thing, Cuboro. In 1999 the company did file a trademark patent, as follows:
Typed Drawing
Word Mark CUBORO
Goods and Services IC 028. US 022 023 038 050. G & S: games and puzzles, namely, marble-tracks, marbles, and manipulative puzzles. FIRST USE: 19991205. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19991205
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Serial Number 75740648
Filing Date June 30, 1999
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1B
Published for Opposition April 18, 2000
Registration Number 2534597
Registration Date January 29, 2002
Owner (REGISTRANT) Etter, Matthias INDIVIDUAL SWITZERLAND Graebli CH-6086 Hasliberg Reuti SWITZERLAND
Attorney of Record Douglas R. Wolf
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE
“you need to make sure that the product doesn't have a U.S. trademark associated with it...”
does the previous patent mean there is a trademark associated with the toy? How does that affect making the toy under a different name, just as long as I don’t use the name Cuboro?
thank you for your time again