Hostile Work Environment and Demotion Due to Employer Relations

[Alpha_Wolf_]

Just to make it clear:

1.) California law cuts no ice anywhere but California. It does not matter a darn what California law would say if you are in Florida.

2.) You have described nothing that would give you legal recourse in California, let alone Florida.

To be clear, all of this was already discussed and I never said that California law had anything to do with Florida.

Rather than repeat myself again and again, you can browse the prior posts.

Thank you for your advice however!

 

[cbg]

My friend, I have been here since before dirt was invented and I work with employment law every day of my life, and have done so for a good 35 years.

I am also quite able to read what you said, and to write clearly.

You might want to dial it down a notch, or you won't last long here.

 

[Alpha_Wolf_]

My friend, I have been here since before dirt was invented and I work with employment law every day of my life, and have done so for a good 35 years.

I am also quite able to read what you said, and to write clearly.

You might want to dial it down a notch, or you won't last long here.

I'm not questioning your knowledge or reading and writing ability.

But when you repeat something that has been beaten dead already, it seems like you didn't take the time to read previous posts.

If that came off as rude to you, it is simply a matter of perception.

I thanked you for the advice, that was not sarcastic. You took the time to respond to my post. But there is no point in me posting the same message over again, so I said you can read prior messages. That is all.

 

[cbg]

I read every word of the thread, thank you. It's not up to you who responds or when. It's not up to you to decide if I want to put emphasis on a point that did not to me appear to be clear, i.e. California law was not violated, either.

I do, however, appreciate the thanks.

 

[eerelations]

To be clear, all of this was already discussed and I never said that California law had anything to do with Florida.

Rather than repeat myself again and again, you can browse the prior posts.

Thank you for your advice however!

Wow, you just blew off the most employment law knowledgeable person in the entire USA! (Said the second most employment law knowledgeable person in the entire USA.) (Well, maybe not the second most, but getting there.) Wow! OP, you may not know much about employment law, but you sure do have some you-know-whats!

 

[Alpha_Wolf_]

I read every word of the thread, thank you. It's not up to you who responds or when. It's not up to you to decide if I want to put emphasis on a point that did not to me appear to be clear, i.e. California law was not violated, either.

I do, however, appreciate the thanks.

You're right, but in the same line of thinking, my perception took it as you possibly not reading prior posts, as when I respond to posts I try to add new information or at least reference a point if it was already mentioned (not judging you).

I took the comment as slightly rude, and you took mine as rude. When I have other users battling me over small things while I give advice to another user, it is sometimes hard to decipher a person's intentions.

The communication from your end explaining yourself was much better however, so again, hats off to you.

I have a direct way of speaking but that in no way means I'm "blowing people off".

EDIT:

For pure laughs, I really do have some big-you-know-whats.

 

[cbg]

Well, not the whole USA. But as regulars on this forum, I'd say you and I, eerelations, definitely are the employment law gurus with Zigner coming in close behind us.

 

[justalayman]

I'm not questioning your knowledge or reading and writing ability.

But when you repeat something that has been beaten dead already, it seems like you didn't take the time to read previous posts.

If that came off as rude to you, it is simply a matter of perception.

I thanked you for the advice, that was not sarcastic. You took the time to respond to my post. But there is no point in me posting the same message over again, so I said you can read prior messages. That is all.

For claiming such an advanced understanding of the literary arts you surely have a lack of understanding what you are being told. Cbg posted simply to make the facts clear. It required no retort by you. Your reply is what changed it to a game of "I get the last word".

As to someone perceiving something you said as rude; again, mr I had the literary skills of a college aged person at the age of twelve, how something is written influences how it is perceived. Given you claim to have such a mastery of literary skills, one must presume the perception by the reader was intentionally crafted to be exactly as it was perceived.



I think I'm starting to understand who the problem at your former employer was.

 

[Zigner]

Well, not the whole USA. But as regulars on this forum, I'd say you and I, eerelations, definitely are the employment law gurus with Zigner coming in close behind us.

Thanks - but I'm admittedly just a dabbler in all but a few specific areas...I'm not sure that I'd say that I'm close behind y'all.

 

[Alpha_Wolf_]

For claiming such an advanced understanding of the literary arts you surely have a lack of understanding what you are being told. Cbg posted simply to make the facts clear. It required no retort by you. Your reply is what changed it to a game of "I get the last word".

As to someone perceiving something you said as rude; again, mr I had the literary skills of a college aged person at the age of twelve, how something is written influences how it is perceived. Given you claim to have such a mastery of literary skills, one must presume the perception by the reader was intentionally crafted to be exactly as it was perceived.



I think I'm starting to understand who the problem at your former employer was.

I cannot help but think that you are victim to exactly what you are accusing me of . . .

If I was trying to get the last word, I wouldn't thank cbg or continue addressing the matter so that everything was clear.

And in regards to your comment about perceiving another's writing, you misread and completely misunderstood my post on another topic. So again, I don't understand why accusations are being thrown around like this when I clearly am not itching to debate with others.

If that was my intention, I'd make it clear. But everyone has their own way of communicating. I have taken cbg's advice already and ceased all arguing. The only one continuing now is you, I would rather choose not to.

So if everything is clear now, I'd like to end the matter, not continue with a game of "let's have the last word".

Seriously. No jabs.

 

[justalayman]

If I was trying to get the last word, I wouldn't thank cbg or continue addressing the matter so that everything was clear.

Um, that is exactly what is happening whether intentional or not (oh he of such fantastic understanding of the literary arts). By continuing to claim gratitude you keep posting "the last word".

If you truly believe what you are saying, there needs be no reply to my post. A post by you will simply prove your obsession of having the last word.