What makes you think you're entitled to any PROOF. Until they take you to court, they don't have to show any proof.
The proof is already in your possession, it was all that paper you signed when you took out the loan.
The proof is not in my possession. No flames here but Excuse me, I have the RIGHTS to ask. That is MY right. I want to make sure the bank did what they were suppose to do and honestly did not commit fraud. This forum will either help me or I'll continue to dig.
When the banks bought my / your Promissory Note, they did not actually give me / you money. When the banks bought my / your Promissory Note from me / you, they stamped it, “paid to the order of (the third party name) without recourse” and turned it into a check. They took that check and cashed it. They bought the house and I / you got the house. It is just the same as if I / you got the money.
Here is the alleged fraud: they bought everything in their name. I / You sold them the Promissory Note, yes, they paid me / you. They paid the builders, the builder gave me / you the house. The thing is, they bought everything in their name. That is illegal. That is a criminal act in and of itself.
If they upheld the law and did things not as a criminal enterprise –
I / you sold them the Promissory Note, they took the money, they paid for the builder in my / your name, you were given the house in my / your name – this would not have generated the fraud. They were not supposed to purchase anything with that money using their name. They got the Promissory Note. They should have just given me / you the money, but they did all these little tricks to confuse everyone. They did everything in their name to make it look like they were doing the purchase, but they were using my / your money. They were really just an agent for me / you.
The money that they were supposed to give me / you
This being said, I want to see the transactions that took place with and without my consent . Again, I KNOW WE / I Have RIGHTS. Again, no flames just stating facts
Why can't we know? That's a rhetorical question. Because they don't want us to know its all just a big Ponzi scheme. If I get banned for asking these questions, being banned is proof enough that even this forum does not want to give out this procedure. What's the difference if the bank takes me to court or I take them? I asked specific questions only to throw in my face " what makes you think I'm entitled". I didn't ask who was entitled. Why can't you just answer the questions?
