New Commercial building with windows looking at backyard and pool

[aphid310@gmail.]

If things don't resolve themselves naturally, could anybody recommend the type of attorney I should talk too?

 

[NIV]

If things don't resolve themselves naturally, could anybody recommend the type of attorney I should talk too?

The most likely to be successful avenue might be from a property attorney with litigation experience.

 

[aphid310@gmail.]

You'll have to see a local attorney to see if there is anything that can be done. I think there might be some negotiation possible to avoid litigation. I agree with the others that there is no assured result. In addition to the case I cited for the law, some older cases that might guide as to how hard you might want to fight. Don't focus on the result of any of them, but on the discussion. None have your exact facts.

Good for you on nuisance, bad for privacy:
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas v. Pascouet, 61 SW 3d 599 - Tex: Court of Appeals 2001

Good for you on privacy:
Baugh v. Fleming, Tex: Court of Appeals, 3rd Dist. 2009

Survellence cameras and privacy may be nuisance:
Webb v. GLENBROOK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Tex: Court of Appeals, 5th Dist. 2009

By the way, were there any official discussions during zoning hearings like a variance? Did you give anything up like attending any zoning hearings because of the vet's promise to mitigate any nuisance?

No, the only reason I found out what they were doing was through their own newsletter. They got an exemption because they were going to retain at least one wall and not change the foot print I believe. Neither are true now from what I see.

Normally, if there is any demo or non residential buildings we get a notice. A church a quarter mile a way had to send one out when they just put on an addition.

Thanks for the case files! Big help.