What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California
I am being sued by an old roommate, we lived together but I wasn't on the lease and we didn't have a contract. She is suing me for a few different things that I shouldn't be responsible for. One is a deposit she didn't get back because the landlord replaced the carpet upstairs,two is an electric bill but we never discussed me ever paying for electric, three is trash removal for couches that her and her dogs ruined that I brought into that home that I gave to her after she ruined them and I got other ones. She agreed to take them when I offered but when it came to the day we moved and I left them in the garage for her, suddenly she didn't want them. Lastly is for rent, now I do owe her some of January and partial for the 13 days in Feb. but that's all. I live paycheck to paycheck and I had a choice either give her money for the rent that month or use what I had to move. I chose to move since that was my only option. She's trying to collect over $3000 from me and I just need to know what I should bring to court on this coming Monday the 6th of November. She is saying I owe her $2000 or more for rent but that's just not true, I only owe her $485 for January and $345.96 for February. That's only $830.96 if I would have had the money to move and give her rent then I would have but I didn't have that option and she knew that I live paycheck to paycheck. She knew for a long time that she was going to be moving and she waited until the last min to tell me. She waited until she got into a new place to tell me that she was putting in the 30 days notice to the landlord. I had no time to figure anything out and no one to help me out or no one to stay with.
Well you seem to have covered everything EXCEPT the most essential element, which is:
WHAT WERE THE TERMS OF YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THE FORMER ROOMMATE?!
Your conclusions of what you think you owe and what you don't think you owe are nothing but self-serving rhetoric and the judge is not about to buy any of it unless you convincingly establish what you and she agreed as being your total financial contribution.
It sounds as if your obligation was limited to a flat monthly dollar figure to include your use and enjoyment of utilities. If so, you need to firmly state so to the court and admit that you do owe something or other for rent, but a lesser amount than she is claiming. You might add if true, that she has never shown you a copy of her underlying lease agreement. And that she has never made it clear whether she in fact has the authority under her lease to sublet raising the question of to whom do you owe rent? To her or her lessor?
If her lease doesn't permit her subletting, then could possible be held liable to the owner of the property under the doctrine of quantum meruit or unjust enrichment.
Also with regard to the utilities make certain that the court understands she's never made any demands on you prior to her lawsuit concerning the utilities and that you have never made any separate payments to her to cover any utility billings. AND in fact she has never presented you with any utility billings.
The same with respect to the security deposit. That is, make it known to the judge that she has never mentioned the subject of the security deposit until she filed her claim.
Try to impress upon the court what seems obvious and that is that she has shot gunned with random claims never before discussed and without any legal grounds other than the issue of rent - which you admit to partly owing; but that you are not sure of to whom it is owed. The more you can dwell on this issue, that is, her right to sublet under her lease, the more it detracts from her evidence.
Curiously though, if the outcome form the court this coming Monday is such a big deal in your life and I'm sure that it is, then why have you waited until the eleventh hour to ask how to represent yourself?