Opposing counsel is lying

[RJR]

Quoting from 404 US 519:

"Whatever may be the limits on the scope of inquiry of courts into the internal administration of prisons, allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient to call for the opportunity to offer supporting evidence. We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers".

Read FN. 1:

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00427/pdf/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00427-0.pdf

 

[quincy]

Quoting from 404 US 519:

"Whatever may be the limits on the scope of inquiry of courts into the internal administration of prisons, allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient to call for the opportunity to offer supporting evidence. We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers".

Read FN. 1:

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00427/pdf/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00427-0.pdf

Did you read the note in its entirety?

 

[RJR]

Did you read the whole case I linked?

 

[quincy]

Did you read the whole case I linked?

Yes. Did you?

 

[RJR]

Yes. Did you?

Come on now, what does FN 1 say? That is pretty clear!

 

[quincy]

Come on now, what does FN 1 say? That is pretty clear!

Did you read it in its entirety? Do you understand what it applies to?

 

[RJR]

Well, I posted law to back up my original statement, can't do no more, but there is more case law out there.

 

[TigerD]

Come on now, what does FN 1 say? That is pretty clear!

And that is why Pro Se litigants are at a decided disadvantage.

TD

 

[Just Blue]

Well, I posted law to back up my original statement, can't do no more, but there is more case law out there.

It really doesn't support your statement.

 

[quincy]

Well, I posted law to back up my original statement, can't do no more, but there is more case law out there.

Please read the case you cited, in its entirety, and tell me what the court was referring to.

 

[RJR]

It really doesn't support your statement.

I did not think it would to you. If quincy posted what I originally did, and I disagreed ,and then he posted the case, you would have agreed with him, right

 

[quincy]

I did not think it would to you. If quincy posted what I originally did, and I disagreed ,and then he posted the case, you would have agreed with him, right

I would hope not. And I would hope I wouldn't say what you said.

 

[Just Blue]

I did not think it would to you. If quincy posted what I originally did, and I disagreed ,and then he posted the case, you would have agreed with him, right

He would not have posted that. BUT!! If quincy lost his mind or something and did post it ...I would have disagreed.

Please...just read the whole thing.

 

[Zigner]

I did not think it would to you. If quincy posted what I originally did, and I disagreed ,and then he posted the case, you would have agreed with him, right

Not if he were wrong

 

[mrsjohnson]

Hang in there and just see what happens. Sorry about your Dog, I know that is painful.

Thank you. She has mammary cancer of all things and the tumors have never seemed to bother her until this week. One has almost doubled in size within a very short period of time. We decided not to operate because of her age. Now I don't know if that was the best decision or not but I was told the surgery itself would be very painful, different vet. Vet today reiterated that so now we have her on pain and anxiety meds.