Hoping it doesnt get to that stage, we have a settlement conference coming up next week.... will be determined by the judge.
Hoping it doesnt get to that stage, we have a settlement conference coming up next week.... will be determined by the judge.
Hoping it doesnt get to that stage, we have a settlement conference coming up next week.
It *will* come that if you and Mom can't come to an agreement on your own.
Do you see yourself changing your mind? Do you see her as contemplating budging even an inch? If the answer to EITHER or these questions is "No", then things will not be settled.
I'm sure Mom will have no problem with GAL involvement since you posted that she wanted a GAL...
I never mentioned mom wanted a GAL involment, I said my attorney suggested it and both of us (mom and me) are opposed to it.
Wrong, per your first post.She suggested GAL in the beginning, to which I opposed.
Wrong, per your first post.![]()
Honestly, my attorney suggested that they can be a hit and miss, and if the judge hasnt ordered a GAL, not to involve one, if I can.
How does:Ok, I meant to say, "My attorney" mentioned GAL in the very beginning, so apologies for being unclear.
equate with the above?Honestly, my attorney suggested that they can be a hit and miss, and if the judge hasnt ordered a GAL, not to involve one, if I can.
This is the problem we're trying to get you to consider - you must be clear. "Well, I *meant*..." isn't going to cut it in court. Like "I do all of the parenting while working FT from home." when, in reality, you have therapists there FT every day. I seriously doubt that they are interrupting you every few minutes for snack & potty breaks. You really need to be clear when you go to court - and that includes your journal...Ok, I meant to say, "My attorney" mentioned GAL in the very beginning, so apologies for being unclear.
How does:
equate with the above?
Makes you look like you are not credible. Your attorney recommended it but then said nope.
That avoids the point actually. You are having a settlement conference because you appear not credible? If that is not the reason, then you need to really understand what has been said.Thats why we are having a settlement conference first, and if that doesn't work out, then a GAL will have to be involved.
We can try mediation before involving a GAL, but all depends on how the settlement conference goes.
That avoids the point actually. You are having a settlement conference because you appear not credible? If that is not the reason, then you need to really understand what has been said.