• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Another fallen tree question...

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Nippy

Junior Member
Thanks so much for your time and expertise here....

Like I said, maybe. If the tree really is a nuisance, then yes, If not, then no.



If he has an expert in trees that tells him the tree is normal, it's safe, etc., and yet the tree blows over in a storm, if you end in court, it's unlikely -- possible, but unlikely -- that a judge or jury would accept your opinion of whether or not the tree was unsafe over the opinion of a (presumably unbiased) tree expert.

My point about the letter is this -- if you send a letter to put him "on notice" and the tree falls, that does not make him automatically liable for the damage. If he can prove that there was nothing wrong with the tree, then it will be an "act of god" and he most likely won't be liable for the cleanup. You can't "create" negligence like this -- my neighbor has trees that are near the property line, I can't simply send him a letter and from now on he is liable should one of those trees ever fall -- there has to be some reason why they are likely to fall.

I don't know your trees, and I am not a tree expert in any event -- maybe your neighbor's tree DOES constitute a potential hazard and you do need to put him on notice -- all I am saying is that notice isn't the be all - end all. You have to have reason to give the notice.

As far as waiting to bring suit, if the tree is in real danger of falling and causing damage to your house, you could go and try an obtain an injunction forcing him to remove the tree, or otherwise abate the dangerous nuisance -- you will need to talk to a lawyer, and likely hire a tree expert to first examine the situation, and then later testify at the hearing. Whether or not this is cost effective will depend on the situation -- talk to a local lawyer or two to weigh your options.

You can't use small claims court until you have actually been damaged in some way -- you can only recover monetary losses in small claims.



That's pretty much it, unless, like I said, its worth pursuing injunctive relief.

Now, there is always the possibility that you could mitigate the hazard yourself, by trimming and pruning or whatever now, and then sue the neighbor to recover your costs in small claims -- but winning such a case is probably a long shot.


i really appreciate it. I'm going to think on this some more and decide the best course of action. If you have any other words of wisdom or advice, please feel free to share them.

Sam
 


las365

Senior Member
LOL! If I was living next door to someone reasonable, then certainly I would take your excellent (and common sense!) appraoch. Unfortunately, I'm living next to a cretin.
Bummer! It would still be a good idea for you to go ahead and get an expert out to look at the trees. You can at least trim the parts of his that overhang your property (with a good defense that you had it done properly if he sues you) and get an opinion as to whether his tree poses the hazrd you are concerned about, as well as trimming yours to try to minimize the debris issue. Best of luck!
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top