Someone who claims to know a thing or two about taxes as well I supposed, but only insomuch as he can spell the word.The nature of his post suggests he's someone we both know.![]()
Someone who claims to know a thing or two about taxes as well I supposed, but only insomuch as he can spell the word.The nature of his post suggests he's someone we both know.![]()
It's not up to judges to prosecute. Its up to the state.why did the judge throw it out? Was it that it was not actually a crime or the judge was of the mind of that he felt the crime was de minimus and as such, simply chose to not continue the prosecution?
unless you have something else stating so, that is NOT what the judge said.SmokeyParkCop;3229393]So you saying that a case in which a judge found that it was NOT illegal to use a public outlet
I always wondered if the folks locked up in the looney bin behind the glass ever realized they were there all alone; apparently that question has been answered.I swear i feel like i'm the only sane person responding to this thread.....OR, you guys are just arguing to be argumentative.
but it is within the judges discretion to toss the charges one the DA files them and that is what it would appear happened here.It's not up to judges to prosecute. Its up to the state.![]()
I always wondered if the folks locked up in the looney bin behind the glass ever realized they were there all alone; apparently that question has been answered.
Now you know.![]()