AZIAN72 Response to your closed thread

[Azian72]

Wow. As I have always suspected, Louisiana IS very weird: stacking counties ~ called "parishes" ~ ATOP each other!

you know what I meant...

 

[Ithildriel]

It's pretty funny that you apparently cohabited with him, and are now trying to make cohabitation an issue. Don't count on the judge buying that.

Nice catch.

 

[Azian72]

Get all the case numbers you want, who and how is no drinking and profanity around the child going to be enforced?

By the judge... , never mind....

 

[Azian72]

Nice catch.

We were engaged...

 

[stealth2]

We were engaged...

Doesn't matter. Engaged is.... unmarried.

 

[Silverplum]

you know what I meant...

After the ceaseless blahblahblah ~ no, I don't. Where I come from, counties are next to each other, contiguous or noncontiguous. Also, where I come from, people are encouraged to speak clearly and concisely.

But you're from Louisiana, so the rules are different. I don't know which parish is beneath you. Perhaps Hell? Is that a parish?

 

[Mbarr77]

We were engaged...

My ex tried the no cohabitation clause, and it did not work because he and I lived together, after we got engaged but before we got married. The judge thought he was funny!

 

[Silverplum]

By the judge... , never mind....

So this judge of whom you speak. How will the judge enforce these rules of yours? Do you plan to keep your judge-mediator on retainer, just to referee your fights? How about your nitpicking?

 

[stealth2]

Aaah, come on, Plum - this one isn't complicated. If ya look on a map, the county "below" is the one that's south. Don't be obstinate.

 

[Azian72]

After the ceaseless blahblahblah ~ no, I don't. Where I come from, counties are next to each other, contiguous or noncontiguous. Also, where I come from, people are encouraged to speak clearly and concisely.

But you're from Louisiana, so the rules are different. I don't know which parish is beneath you. Perhaps Hell? Is that a parish?

Your opinion is entitled...
But back to the issue... thank you BB, I appreciate your opinion.

 

[Silverplum]

Doesn't matter. Unmarried is.... unmarried.

But he gave her a ring! In New Mexico! And said something about making baybees!

 

[Silverplum]

Aaah, come on, Plum - this one isn't complicated. If ya look on a map, the county "below" is the one that's south. Don't be obstinate.

And just imagine: I was thinking of Hell.

 

[Ithildriel]

By the judge... , never mind....

I'm serious though, really, think about it. How are you even going to know if he is cursing or drinking around the baby. And even if you do know, how are you going to prove it?

Are you going to file contempt every visitation saying Dad said damn, or Dad had a beer after baby went to bed? Do you not think the judge is going to get irritated with you after a few of these? Your energy would be better served elsewhere.

Now if Dad gets a DUI with baby in the car, then you have documentation that dad is a danger to the child, and nothing needs to be in the court order to make that stick.

If you just want it in their as a scare tactic, and you think that your parishes court will ok it, then great, but you just need to realize, that they aren't much more than words on paper.

 

[nextwife]

"No-alchohol" is impossible to enforce, and pretty extreme.

My hubby and I are very responsible older parents. Neither of us uses much alchohol at all, however, we DO dine out, and we DO bring kiddo with us (our parents are deceased and finding sitters is not easy in my area), and we DO, on occassion, order a glass of wine, a margarita, or a beer, as meets the occassion.

Be advised also, that certain RELIGIOUS observances include the presence of wine. Jews and Catholics and others may utilize wine in a service. Thus such a prohibition may interfere with Dad's right to religious observance. Anyway - there is a DIFFERENCE between modest consumption of alchohol socially, and alchohol abuse.

 

[Azian72]

are you from Louisiana?

My ex tried the no cohabitation clause, and it did not work because he and I lived together, after we got engaged but before we got married. The judge thought he was funny!