Zigner
Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Ok, so I quoted the wrong statue, the real one is there. Find it yourself. I have nothing else to prove to you.
I agree. You've proven all you need to...
Ok, so I quoted the wrong statue, the real one is there. Find it yourself. I have nothing else to prove to you.
Have you been eating many cars?
Just to be clear - from the same federal law you posted comes the following:
The Commission shall have no authority under this section or section 57a of this title to declare unlawful an act or practice on the grounds that such act or practice is unfair unless the act or practice causes or is likely to cause substantial injury to consumers which is not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.
Are you claiming that a consumer would not reasonably be able to avoid damages from not being able to buy the car that is advertised, really?
![]()
Can you honestly say after everything I said, and everything I have posted and quoted that you still believe they are in compliance with the law as it is written. Mistake or not. Last time I checked, ignorance was no excuse for the law, would you agree?
No, the word I was looking for is ignorance. Thanks though.
Ok, now tell me what a person's damages are...
Let's say they can't sell your car, but they sell a comparable vehicle at a comparable price. Maybe even a better vehicle at the same price. What are the damages.
Seriously, you are being a busy body. You have a vendetta against the dealer.
Tell you what - call the cops and the local municipality. They'll tell you who you can call. However, you got nothing.
Lets start simple. Would you agree that if there was no comparable item, and the only reason they were advertising that car was to get people to their dealership that they would be breaking the law as it is written?