• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Being sued from a lease over 6 years ago (IL/NJ)?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatDC
  • Start date Start date

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

P

PatDC

Guest
Hi,

I am a resident currently of New Jersey, but this matter (beyond a summons served to me in NJ) is from 1997 and [/b]Illinois[/b].

I was a resident of a 'student' apartment managed by a local/small apartment and property management firm that primarily deals in student apartments around the ISU campus. I had a lease for the term of 8/16/97 to 5/8/98 for the sum total of $5600 + $300 refundable deposit. The lease is signed by myself and my brother, the only residents of this apartment.

We lived there the entire term of the lease and then moved out to Bloomington IL into a new residence (standard apartment, standard lease). I was refunded the majority of my deposit which I signed over directly to the new landlord. At no point did we have any major rent issues with the student apartment - payments were broken up into 3 or 4 'chunks as I recall and everything was paid. Indeed, both myself and my brother were employed as computer consultants (contractors) for State Farm and we made a very good income, so no money issues of note during this time period of residence in that apartment.

It goes so far as I KNOW the manager of the property management firm personall, if only in passing, and even did a few short jobs on their PC systems in their office while living there. I have ran into the manager several times prior to moving to NJ, once socially, since living at their propery - never a word was spoken.

At no point prior to moving to NJ in Oct/Nov of 2001 was any attempt made by the property management firm or any debt collection agency to contact me regarding any outstanding rent. I lived at the same residence, with the same number after moving out and lived in the 'credit' world so I and my brother were easily found if so desired - in fact, I gave the old property management company my new address and phone number and used them as a reference in acquiring my new apartment. I even recieved back the balance of my deposit on that apartment which I signed over to the new landlord on my new apartment, something I can't imagine would be returned to me if I still owed nearly $1000 dollars in rent.

Apparently in march of 2001 a small legal firm was retained by the property management company and they filed a legal action in Bloomington in November of 2001. They even said on the phone they made no attempt to contact me prior to this filling.

Of course they tried to serve me, but I moved to NJ/NYC in this time frame (November 01) unaware of such goings on. The legal secretary of the small law firm indicated on the phone that they just filed a suit as requested. I have not lived in shadows, having credit and filed taxes and having no major issues here in NJ, so again I feel that I was easily 'found' if they so desired... but it took them another 3 years to do so and serve me with a summons.

The original legal paperwork and filing of the suit is from Nov of 01. The current summons is filed as of 08/06/04. I was served by a Bergen county sherrif, much to my surprise and shock.

They have NOT served my brother and co lease signor. He has been in the same residence in Bloomington for nearly five years, has served as a witness in nearly 2 dozen court cases (check fraud, theft, assault cases at the store he works at), and has himself had a minor run in with the law that resulted in a years probation... easily found and tracked I would think.

Making the above more interesting is the fact that my Father's company was actually in negotiations with this law firm to acquire or lease an office space they represent for the owner on. My brother, the one they seemingly can't find, was their point of contact for this as he was going to be one of the prime employees and managers of this new office space. They also would have been aware of me and my contact info as I was also going to contract some work with my dads company initially.

At no point after moving out of the property in question was any attempt by the management company, debt collectors, or this law firm made to contact me regarding a debt they percieve me as owing.

Problem issues:

1) The bank where I did my banking is long gone/bought out and now closed.

2) Some payments of rent would have been made in person and in cash to the management office. Receipts were of course issued, but this was nearly SEVEN years ago.

3) I don't have any financial records or anything pertaining to that apartment in my personal files. We regularly purge anything over 5 years in all regards (we being my wife and I).

4) About the only thing I may have to prove my case are the facts that I was gainfully employed and well compensated while living there (as was my brother) and the fact that I signed over the deposit refund check to my new landlord there in bloomington (as I recall). Unfortunately I have no idea of what his record keeping is like from so long ago either.

My Questions:

1) Can they even sue me so long after the end of the lease - Statute of limitations?

2) Can they sue me in IL even though I live in NJ?

3) How can I defend myself given my lack of records?

What I have done so far:

- I am sending a letter of contestation via fax (with receipt) to that firm suing me that does NOT acknowledge the debt, only that I contest it.

- I have requested via phone (all information logged) that they send me all logs of phone attempts to contact me by the management company, any debt agency they may have engaged, and the law firm. I also requested copies of reciepts of certified mail attempts to contact me (it is my understanding that before they file suit they have to have proof they tried to settle the debt first and contact me, usually by certified/tracked mail or other similar means).

- I have requested a copy of their ledger on what they show that I and my brother owe.

- I questioned, at length, why this was happening, letting them know I know the owner semi-personally, that I was easily found prior to moving, that I got my deposit check back, that I wasn't broke or hurting for money while living there, etc.

- I questioned the validity of such a claim so long after the end date of the lease.

Somehow I think this has to be a big foul up on the management companies part. It's been so long, but as I recall they had some seriously fouled up PCs and software in their office back then and at least one of them had died completely to the point that I could't repair it or recover data. It just makes no sense, they could have called or even knocked on my door (it's the typical midwest small town/city scenario), they knew where I lived, etc... not a word until last night.

My big worry is that they have dorked up books they are relying on, which I really can't disprove so long after the fact... I don't have any records at all at this point given how long ago it was.

I suppose I could pay, it's money I rather not part with (not rich, but more so I don't like being ripped off).

Comments? Suggestions? Answers? Pointers?
 


thelizzy

Member
Holy long post, Batman.

Could you edit your original post and make it a bit shorter so it's not so much to get through? I know you want to be thorough and give us all the information we need, but dang, that's a lot of info.
 
P

PatDC

Guest
Not sure what I can cut out... it's all relevant I think.

To boil it down a bit.

Being sued via a retained lawer by a property management company, served last night here in NJ.

Suit is in IL.

I and the other person on the lease paid in full, management company even gave us back our deposit (minus a small deduction for a repair) which I signed over the check to our new landlord.

Old management company even had our new address and phone and was used as a reference, and I lived in the new place until Nov 01.

Original lease started in 8/97 and ended 5/98.

Management company retained lawyer and directed them to sue me in 3/01, they filed the first suit in 11/01 around the time I moved. They tried to serve me first in 11/01.

Papers served last night in current suit attempt/service attemp are dated 8/04.

This was nearly 7 years ago, I don't have any records for that going back that far. Both myself and my room mate were gainfully employeed, no payment problems (hell, they gave the deposit back!). Best evidence I may have, maybe, is the fact that I signed their check on the returned deposit over to new landlord, maybe... again, nearly 7 years ago.

I know, in passing, the manager of the management company and ran into him or even worked for him on several occasions... no mention of me owing anything and he does know me. Lawyer suing me never tried to contact me prior to filing suit. No contact from anyone regarding any outstanding debt prior to service of papers last night. I was not, in any way, hard to find... management company had my phone number and address for the remainder of time I lived in Bloomington... nearly four years.

Am sendinging fax letter contesting bill without acknowledging my responsiblity to it. Have requested records of their attempts to contact me (management company, any debt collector they may have engaged, and the lawyer) including copies of certified mail receipts from attempts.

They did NOT file on the other signatory on the lease... he's not moved in nearly five years and is well known in the legal circles as he testifies as a prosecution witness all the time due to his employment and has himself been on probabtion for a year for something stupid.
 
L

LittleNapolean

Guest
How about telling us what you are being sued for.
 

HomeGuru

Senior Member
PatDC said:
Hi,

I am a resident currently of New Jersey, but this matter (beyond a summons served to me in NJ) is from 1997 and [/b]Illinois[/b].

I was a resident of a 'student' apartment managed by a local/small apartment and property management firm that primarily deals in student apartments around the ISU campus. I had a lease for the term of 8/16/97 to 5/8/98 for the sum total of $5600 + $300 refundable deposit. The lease is signed by myself and my brother, the only residents of this apartment.

We lived there the entire term of the lease and then moved out to Bloomington IL into a new residence (standard apartment, standard lease). I was refunded the majority of my deposit which I signed over directly to the new landlord. At no point did we have any major rent issues with the student apartment - payments were broken up into 3 or 4 'chunks as I recall and everything was paid. Indeed, both myself and my brother were employed as computer consultants (contractors) for State Farm and we made a very good income, so no money issues of note during this time period of residence in that apartment.

It goes so far as I KNOW the manager of the property management firm personall, if only in passing, and even did a few short jobs on their PC systems in their office while living there. I have ran into the manager several times prior to moving to NJ, once socially, since living at their propery - never a word was spoken.

At no point prior to moving to NJ in Oct/Nov of 2001 was any attempt made by the property management firm or any debt collection agency to contact me regarding any outstanding rent. I lived at the same residence, with the same number after moving out and lived in the 'credit' world so I and my brother were easily found if so desired - in fact, I gave the old property management company my new address and phone number and used them as a reference in acquiring my new apartment. I even recieved back the balance of my deposit on that apartment which I signed over to the new landlord on my new apartment, something I can't imagine would be returned to me if I still owed nearly $1000 dollars in rent.

Apparently in march of 2001 a small legal firm was retained by the property management company and they filed a legal action in Bloomington in November of 2001. They even said on the phone they made no attempt to contact me prior to this filling.

Of course they tried to serve me, but I moved to NJ/NYC in this time frame (November 01) unaware of such goings on. The legal secretary of the small law firm indicated on the phone that they just filed a suit as requested. I have not lived in shadows, having credit and filed taxes and having no major issues here in NJ, so again I feel that I was easily 'found' if they so desired... but it took them another 3 years to do so and serve me with a summons.

The original legal paperwork and filing of the suit is from Nov of 01. The current summons is filed as of 08/06/04. I was served by a Bergen county sherrif, much to my surprise and shock.

They have NOT served my brother and co lease signor. He has been in the same residence in Bloomington for nearly five years, has served as a witness in nearly 2 dozen court cases (check fraud, theft, assault cases at the store he works at), and has himself had a minor run in with the law that resulted in a years probation... easily found and tracked I would think.

Making the above more interesting is the fact that my Father's company was actually in negotiations with this law firm to acquire or lease an office space they represent for the owner on. My brother, the one they seemingly can't find, was their point of contact for this as he was going to be one of the prime employees and managers of this new office space. They also would have been aware of me and my contact info as I was also going to contract some work with my dads company initially.

At no point after moving out of the property in question was any attempt by the management company, debt collectors, or this law firm made to contact me regarding a debt they percieve me as owing.

Problem issues:

1) The bank where I did my banking is long gone/bought out and now closed.

2) Some payments of rent would have been made in person and in cash to the management office. Receipts were of course issued, but this was nearly SEVEN years ago.

3) I don't have any financial records or anything pertaining to that apartment in my personal files. We regularly purge anything over 5 years in all regards (we being my wife and I).

4) About the only thing I may have to prove my case are the facts that I was gainfully employed and well compensated while living there (as was my brother) and the fact that I signed over the deposit refund check to my new landlord there in bloomington (as I recall). Unfortunately I have no idea of what his record keeping is like from so long ago either.

My Questions:

1) Can they even sue me so long after the end of the lease - Statute of limitations?

2) Can they sue me in IL even though I live in NJ?

3) How can I defend myself given my lack of records?

What I have done so far:

- I am sending a letter of contestation via fax (with receipt) to that firm suing me that does NOT acknowledge the debt, only that I contest it.

- I have requested via phone (all information logged) that they send me all logs of phone attempts to contact me by the management company, any debt agency they may have engaged, and the law firm. I also requested copies of reciepts of certified mail attempts to contact me (it is my understanding that before they file suit they have to have proof they tried to settle the debt first and contact me, usually by certified/tracked mail or other similar means).

- I have requested a copy of their ledger on what they show that I and my brother owe.

- I questioned, at length, why this was happening, letting them know I know the owner semi-personally, that I was easily found prior to moving, that I got my deposit check back, that I wasn't broke or hurting for money while living there, etc.

- I questioned the validity of such a claim so long after the end date of the lease.

Somehow I think this has to be a big foul up on the management companies part. It's been so long, but as I recall they had some seriously fouled up PCs and software in their office back then and at least one of them had died completely to the point that I could't repair it or recover data. It just makes no sense, they could have called or even knocked on my door (it's the typical midwest small town/city scenario), they knew where I lived, etc... not a word until last night.

My big worry is that they have dorked up books they are relying on, which I really can't disprove so long after the fact... I don't have any records at all at this point given how long ago it was.

I suppose I could pay, it's money I rather not part with (not rich, but more so I don't like being ripped off).

Comments? Suggestions? Answers? Pointers?

**A: here is a comment and a suggestion- if you make your post brief like the directions say, you would have a better chance of getting a response.
 
P

PatDC

Guest
And as requested I boiled it down further. These are the facts of the matter and most if not all are important in one way or another.
 

JETX

Senior Member
PatDC said:
Original lease started in 8/97 and ended 5/98.

Management company retained lawyer and directed them to sue me in 3/01, they filed the first suit in 11/01 around the time I moved. They tried to serve me first in 11/01.
The SOL for a written contract in Illinois is 10 years, so this debt would still be enforceable by law.

Papers served last night in current suit attempt/service attemp are dated 8/04.
As noted above, still within the 10 year allowed SOL. Further, most states 'freeze' the SOL when a debtor leaves the state, so even if the SOL were shorter, it would likely still be valid.

This was nearly 7 years ago, I don't have any records for that going back that far.
Then defending yourself against their lawsuit will probably be made harder by your lack of records.

Lawyer suing me never tried to contact me prior to filing suit. No contact from anyone regarding any outstanding debt prior to service of papers last night. I was not, in any way, hard to find... management company had my phone number and address for the remainder of time I lived in Bloomington... nearly four years.
Okay, not relevant.... but okay.

Am sendinging fax letter contesting bill without acknowledging my responsiblity to it. Have requested records of their attempts to contact me (management company, any debt collector they may have engaged, and the lawyer) including copies of certified mail receipts from attempts.
Okay, and since their is no statutory obligation for them to contact you, what do you hope to gain by that??

They did NOT file on the other signatory on the lease... he's not moved in nearly five years and is well known in the legal circles as he testifies as a prosecution witness all the time due to his employment and has himself been on probabtion for a year for something stupid.
Okay, again not relevant. The claimant can decide to sue one, or all, of the responsible parties. Of course, you can file to add him as a co-defendant and at least hopefully get his name included in any judgment that might be awarded.
 
P

PatDC

Guest
So essentially their bad book keeping or otherwise their mistake shafts me into paying them on such an old account/debt they suppose exists? Well, aint that great.

I was not aware that someone could just run out and sue you without first making reasonable attempt to remedy a percieved debt first through debt collection practices.

I have contacted the other person on the lease and he is just as sure as I am that the leese was paid in full - no question on our part. I don't know anyone who keeps that kind of detailed records over five years old... what's the point?

And why would they return my deposit to me if I still owed them a significant amount of money? That's just dumb (and I would think note the discharge of debt on their part, or if you want, the satisfactory end of the contract).

Is the statue really that long???: http://www.findgreatlawyers.com/Areas/ContractIssues/14StatuteLimit.htm

The above link indicates that the statue of limits on a lease contract, including breach of warranty or indemnity, must be commenced within 4 years after the cause of action accrued. I am obviously not a lawyer, but the way that reads then they had to initiate action within 4 years. Of course, even that is hazy and dependent on either the preceeding file date or the original action date (8/6/04 and 11/13/01 respectively).
 
C

cider

Guest
So essentially their bad book keeping ... shafts me...

It also took your bad bookkeeping. Had you kept your books (receipts, etc.), you would have proof of payment. The "throw it away after three/five/seven/etc years" rule is not a good one. I have records going back more than 20 years.

I don't know anyone who keeps that kind of detailed records over five years old...

Now you do. ;)

...what's the point?

The point is illustrated by your current problem.

I was not aware that someone could just run out and sue you without first making reasonable attempt to remedy a percieved debt first through debt collection practices.

Unless there is an agreement for some other prior notification or action, someone can indeeed just run right out and sue you.

And why would they return my deposit to me if I still owed them a significant amount of money?

It could have been a mistake.

That's just dumb (and I would think note the discharge of debt on their part, or if you want, the satisfactory end of the contract).

It's circumstantial evidence that you satisfied the lease, but if they accidently returned your deposit, that wouldn't void their statutory and contractual right to collect what they were owed. By the way, can you prove they returned your deposit?


<
 

JETX

Senior Member
PatDC said:
Is the statue really that long???
The site you refer to is for breach of a lease obligation. The SOL I looked at is for the SOL on a debt by written contract.

Your L-O-N-G post provided everything (and more) but failed to say what their claim is actually for. If it is for breach of the lease, you can certainly try to assert the four year SOL as you referenced. However, if it is for damages, I would think the longer 10 year SOL would apply as would NOT be a breach.

I am obviously not a lawyer, but the way that reads then they had to initiate action within 4 years.
Correct, if the action is brought due to "An action for default, including breach
of warranty or indemnity". I doubt that this claim would qualify.

I believe that this is the limitation that would apply in your case:
"735 ILCS 5/13&#8209;206. Ten year limitation.
Except as provided in Section 2&#8209;725 of the "Uniform Commercial Code", actions on bonds, promissory notes, bills of exchange, written leases, written contracts, or other evidences of indebtedness in writing, shall be commenced within 10 years next after the cause of action accrued; but if any payment or new promise to pay has been made, in writing, on any bond, note, bill, lease, contract, or other written evidence of indebtedness, within or after the period of 10 years, then an action may be commenced thereon at any time within 10 years after the time of such payment or promise to pay."
 
P

PatDC

Guest
The claim is for rent unpaid, ie breach of contract on the lease written lease. That's why I am wondering if the 4 year SOL applies.

As for evidence on the returned deposit. They sent me a check several weeks after moving out, which I signed over to the new landlord as he agreed to wait on part of the deposit until I got mine back. He 'may' have a record of such. Additional evidence is that the ledger shows them subtracting $37 bucks for repairs and cleaning (minor hole in wall I could not fix and a tear in a screen) per the legal secretary I talked to today at that firm.

My roommate (Brother) remembers making the last payment, in cash as were most of our payments (why not, they give a receipt and it was handy since they were right next to our now closed bank only 1/2 mile away from our apartment). It was for approximately the amount they claim they didn't get (over 900 dollars). It was to a guy my room mate/brother had never seen before, but he was given a receipt (which after this long of course he doesn't have) and the dude did supposedly make an entry in that ledger/receipt book. More and more I think maybe they have an accounting problem... possibly theft.

Something else that sticks with me about all this. The lawsuit claims as a point on the paperwork for filing that the apartment management company made numerous attempts to contact me regarding this debt prior to turning it over to the law firm. My understanding is that they would at least have to try and used some trackable method at least once before their handing over to collection or lawyer, such as certified mail - more a polite practice than a law, but I have seen it before on a few small bills back in college and immediately after. They had my address and phone number and indeed I worked on their PCs in their office after moving out as well as ran into the manager for that company... no attempt was ever made, not once. They also claim they couldn't find me, but they have my address/phone and I am certainly not hiding (Credit history, voting history, employment history, military record of address, traffic tickets, and on and on... hell, a 1 minute search on the internet would have shown my address even). Same goes for my bro, and he was on probation as well as a frequent witness in prosecution cases there in that town.

Hell, they had my emergency contact info, my parents, and my folks would have given them anything they wanted had they called.

They new I was a guardsman as well... all they had to do was call the base and they would have had all the cooperation and information in the world they could ask for, and I would have gotten a lot of pressure and problems for such a thing.

All around this doesn't smell right... not at all.
 
P

PatDC

Guest
No comment on the SOL on rental property leases contracts in IL (4 yrs vs 10 yrs)?

I got a list of account information and other documents, per my written request to the lawyer. In this packet an interesting fact comes to light... the rental management company is stickler for on-time payment and will notice your apartment after being a few days late on a scheduled payment (the payments were not monthly, but rather larger lump sum payments due at irregular intervals that favor the early months of the lease period).

I moved out in mid/late May and had gotten a few of these notices for late payments (hey, was living on weekly checks, so was room mate, payment times didn't always line up accordingly with our pay days). These three notices, one from sept, one from nov, and one from Feb 11 were shown as delivered and paid.

There are NO notices of late or deliquent payments after this period of time (feb 11) even though I owed money in my last lump payment due right around that time (which of course I contend was paid).

To summarize:
1) They indicated on the court filing they could not locate me, yet they have had my information on hand since before I moved out and I was EASY to find, call, mail, talk to in the same place until I moved to NJ.
2) This is from 7 years ago, it may be past the 4 year SOL (though the lawyer for their side obviously says otherwise).
3) The rental management firm returned my deposit, sans a small deduction for a repair, via mail and in check form which I signed over to my new landlord.
4) They acted as a reference for me in my next living situation.
5) They were sticklers for making notice on late/deliquent payments, yet interestingly enough they make no notice on me as a resident after Feb 11 and I didn't move out until May.
6) I vaguely know the manager of that company and he visited my home soon after I moved out, I worked in his office once after moving out doing computer consultancy work, no mention of a debt owed.
7) No evidence that they EVER tried to contact me prior to engaging the lawyer, and the lawyer made no effort to contact me prior to filling his greedy little suit (yeah, I know, they don't have to, but common courtesy and practice would indicate that they might have tried since they were acting as debt collectors and all).

After talking to this schmuck lawyer I am so damned ANGRY I can't hardly breath honestly. He has NO INTEREST in checking into any of this, doesn't care in the least that any of it seems dodgy, was a real prick on the phone.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top