blood sucking ex wife

[LYSSA1020]

massachusetts
i live with my boyfriend. we have a new baby together, his first and only child. he was previously married for about 20 years. in his divorce he was ordered to pay 200$ a week to his ex in alimony, permant alimony. they have been divorced for about 4 years now. he was also ordered to carrier her on his medical insurance. he was recently notified through his employer that divorcees were no longer covered.as his company is self insured. now she is taking him back to court to try and make him pay the 300$ a month it will cost her for insurance on top of his alimony payments!!! he is still making the same money at his full time job but hasnt worked at his additional pt job in a few years, he now has a child of his own. he also totally supports a family of five. he, myself,his child and my two children from a previious relationship. his ex works a full time job and is not hurting for money in any way. she does have medical problems but they have not kept her from maintaining a ft job. we are barely making ends meet here. and he works saturdays to try and make up for the alimony. this is taking time away from spending time with his 6 month old son. is there any chance of reversal, decrease, or a least a chance he wont ind up giving this parasite any more moneymoney?????

 

[BethM]

Uh, might should have put some thought into having a child with a man who has such financial obligations. Is there a chance of reversal...no, not unless there has been a change in circumstances and I don't believe the courts would consider the fact that he has a child now and, on top of that married someone with two children of her own that he has to support. That is something he has done voluntarily, it wasn't forced on him.

Why is he supporting your children? Don't they have a father who is responsible for that? As for his blood sucking ex wife, well, I hope you never know what it's like to be left after 20 years. Evidently the mediator or judge in this case had a good understanding and did the proper thing for the bloodsucker.

 

[stealth2]

Oh brother. He has no obligation to support your kids with someone else. If you need to, go after their fathers for support.

He is under a court order to pay alimony and provide her with insurance. If he can't do it through his own company, yes, he's going to have to pay for her to get other coverage.

If you're not making ends meet, you can go after support for your other two cildren. And you could consider a novel idea - get a job yourself.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

This has GOT to be a singlewide story

 

[nextwife]

massachusetts
i live with my boyfriend. we have a new baby together, his first and only child.

Heck, Hon, I'm mom, to a child of my hubby and I and he was paying CS (not anymore, thank goodness).

I sure didn't want to work him to death also totally supporting us. So I work and make a comparable income to that of my husband and not a penny that I make goes to any household but mine. When you plan a family with one who already has a financial obligation to another family, you'd better either be willing to live on a lot less OR willing to make up the difference.

 

[Lorane]

This is an injustice. No one should receive lifetime alimony unless truely disabled. The courts are awarding lifetime alimony unlawfully. This woman holds a ft job and has no children at home, she should not be receiveing alimony.

Laws like this need to be challanged on all levels and in all states.

I am a woman, who rasied two children, without child support or alimony, went to college at nights and weekends. My children are well rounded adults and have wonderful families of their own.

Welfare in the form of alimony is totally unnecessary. Make laws that are in the best interest of the families. Tying one to an ex for the rest of their lives is pure vendictiveness.

Did this woman get up in the morings and fix breakfast for the children, get them off to school every day? Did this woman have dinner on the table for her husband each evening? Did this woman take the time to love her family and show interest in them? None of these issues are covered.

Even a woman who has done all the above, does not deserve lifetime alimony.
This means that she did what one would do if their heart was filled with the love of God. But she/he does not go and request welfare/alimony.

This man may have found a woman who truely loves him. Not one that wanted to have honor and obey taken out of the marriage vows.

Don't be so quick to back up welfare.

 

[stealth2]

This man may have found a woman who truely loves him.

As well as one who wants him to support two kids that aren't his.

 

[Terence Beckham]

This is an injustice. No one should receive lifetime alimony unless truely disabled. The courts are awarding lifetime alimony unlawfully. This woman holds a ft job and has no children at home, she should not be receiveing alimony.

Laws like this need to be challanged on all levels and in all states.

I am a woman, who rasied two children, without child support or alimony, went to college at nights and weekends. My children are well rounded adults and have wonderful families of their own.

Welfare in the form of alimony is totally unnecessary. Make laws that are in the best interest of the families. Tying one to an ex for the rest of their lives is pure vendictiveness.

Did this woman get up in the morings and fix breakfast for the children, get them off to school every day? Did this woman have dinner on the table for her husband each evening? Did this woman take the time to love her family and show interest in them? None of these issues are covered.

Even a woman who has done all the above, does not deserve lifetime alimony.
This means that she did what one would do if their heart was filled with the love of God. But she/he does not go and request welfare/alimony.

This man may have found a woman who truely loves him. Not one that wanted to have honor and obey taken out of the marriage vows.

Don't be so quick to back up welfare.

Now if all women were like this lady above..then men would not be commitment phobic!


Equality and Chivalry a toxic mic...that leaves the lawyers to lap up the spoils

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Now if all women were like this lady above..then men would not be commitment phobic!

Lorane is off her med again

 

[Lorane]

I will say it again, whether the law agrees or not. No one should get a free ride in life!

BelizeBreeze, if you would give advise that was helpful, then someone might pay attention to you. Most on the board think you are rude.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

I will say it again, whether the law agrees or not. No one should get a free ride in life!

BelizeBreeze, if you would give advise that was helpful, then someone might pay attention to you. Most on the board think you are rude.

And if you knew me you'd know I don't give a damn what 'most' think Now take your meds. You've had your 15 minutes

 

[stealth2]

BelizeBreeze, if you would give advise that was helpful, then someone might pay attention to you.

A: That would be adviCe.

Most on the board think you are rude.

A: And how the heck do you know what "most" of the board thinks?

 

[VeronicaGia]

I'm thinking that if he can prove his employer will no longer cover his ex spouse, this is a significant change in circumstances and he could beat her to the punch and file for a modification of at least the medical portion. No one can tell you what a judge will decide though.

 

[AHA]

This is an injustice. No one should receive lifetime alimony unless truely disabled. The courts are awarding lifetime alimony unlawfully. This woman holds a ft job and has no children at home, she should not be receiveing alimony.

Laws like this need to be challanged on all levels and in all states.

I am a woman, who rasied two children, without child support or alimony, went to college at nights and weekends. My children are well rounded adults and have wonderful families of their own.

Welfare in the form of alimony is totally unnecessary. Make laws that are in the best interest of the families. Tying one to an ex for the rest of their lives is pure vendictiveness.

Did this woman get up in the morings and fix breakfast for the children, get them off to school every day? Did this woman have dinner on the table for her husband each evening? Did this woman take the time to love her family and show interest in them? None of these issues are covered.

Even a woman who has done all the above, does not deserve lifetime alimony.
This means that she did what one would do if their heart was filled with the love of God. But she/he does not go and request welfare/alimony.

This man may have found a woman who truely loves him. Not one that wanted to have honor and obey taken out of the marriage vows.

Don't be so quick to back up welfare.

You have no idea why this woman was awarded alimony, a judge can grant an exwife alimony without her having spent 20 years wiping babies butts every hour of every day and sweating by a hot stove several times a day.
We know waaaaaaaay to little about the why's in this case, so go easy with the axe.

 

[BelizeBreeze]

Why the hell anyone would consider lorane having any kind of legitimate legal point hasn't read any of her posts....
It's as if she's the LOST Grimm brother in drag