Smarty Panties
Member
Why do all these threads turn in to SM against BM sagas?
-
FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Can Child Support Guildlines Be Changed?
- Thread starter SM5NY
- Start date
Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills Please click a topic or scroll down for more.
Really? Because I choose to be smart about it? Because I choose to wait until I'm financially stable? Until I own my own home to raise them? I'm not hell-bent of getting knocked up before I'm ready.my2cents said:
It doesn't suprise me. I'm a hell of a lot better off than those people my age with two kids and bf ran off to be in the circus, so buzz off.
And since you can't justify your behavior, it's an excellent choice to attack me personally. Again, bravo!
Gryn
Ok, Lets jusst stop the arguing and get back to the problem. After all everybody is entitled to their own opinion. However, 2cents you can be pretty harsh and should stop flying off the handle. I will choose to ignore your rude comments cause I can. But it if are bitter about something and have a problem POST it and we'll reply. (SO, how bout thoses Mets)..lol
Anywhy, Everybody knows a man would not get away with it. Even though I'm a women and you would think spightful, I just think it should be the same casue after all 17% is the state guildline. As I recall a judge can make other judgements with substantial findings, but there were not any, just an electronic testimony of this women crying over her bill and other kid. She even made a statement to the judge saying "I don't think I should pay for a kid I don't see".... ( remember the NCP.. doesn't call, no b-day gifts, christamas gift, card or letters in general)
Anywhy, Everybody knows a man would not get away with it. Even though I'm a women and you would think spightful, I just think it should be the same casue after all 17% is the state guildline. As I recall a judge can make other judgements with substantial findings, but there were not any, just an electronic testimony of this women crying over her bill and other kid. She even made a statement to the judge saying "I don't think I should pay for a kid I don't see".... ( remember the NCP.. doesn't call, no b-day gifts, christamas gift, card or letters in general)
So you'd like to start this up again?my2cents said:
(So did you)
My opinion was that you were posting inaccurate and damaging posts based on your personal experience and not the OP's actual situation.
I agree that there may be things left out, maybe because she doesn't think they matter, it didn't occur to her, or she thinks it's none of our beeswax. Still I think the only thing you and your husband can do now is contest the judgment. Maybe you could come up with past cases that may be similar, and make a case to keep with the standard, and legal precedent.
As for you 2Cent, your attacks on me are laughable and without merit. I think you're just posting to see your own words on screen. Maybe you even have a "I have to have the last word" problem.
Whatever.
OP: I don't think there's much more you two can do until the appeal. Love your step-child in the mean time, and even if things don't go your way, it doesn't mean her love for you is any less. Bad people exist, and if they don't care about their progeny then screw them. Bio-mom doesn't know what she's missing out on... only you and your husband do.
Your husband needs to stand up for his child (which I'm sure he is) and support his position. The judge can't be that unreasonable, can s/he?
Good luck and take care.
Gryn
Last edited:
I'm completely shocked that someone can cut their cs in half just because of new partner choose not to work, having another kid, wrecking car, loan from parents and high phone bill!!!!!! All of those things are pretty much voluntary, no one forced any of them upon the ex, she chose to end up it that mess.
Astounding that a US court would allow a young US child to suffer the consequences for it. Sometimes kids welfare just don't mean s**t in the US.
Astounding that a US court would allow a young US child to suffer the consequences for it. Sometimes kids welfare just don't mean s**t in the US.
Oh, but I disagree! I think the OP solved her own problem when she said her husband was going to appeal. I think that was a marvelous solution to her problem at this stage in the game.my2cents said:Good Idea AHA. That's probably the best advice in the whole thread so far.
A four page thread now and no solid solution. OUCH...that got out of hand!
Sorry for my involvement in the fiasco!
Gryn
Ok, truth of the matter and this (yes) coming for the "wicked step-moster)..lol, is like the facts stated before Bio mom, has never paid anything and never been made to pay anything. My husband and her where both in the military and he was injured and released. She stayed and got remarried had another kid.. etc. Right now she is stantioned in England, rank senior airman and works in an office as a Secretary...for one of the departments ( not kncking the job).my2cents said:
In the first order my husband agreed to not have her pay support cause of her cost of living in England and they somewhat came to a happy medium with that. Also not support so that she could come her and visit with the child and buy her thing in Europe. In the past 3 years she has on called 7 times, has not sent ANY b-day, christmas gift, cards, letter etc. nor come to even visit her child. Like she was suppose to from the order. Since my husband took her to court under changing circumstances such as need of child with school starting... his job changed not by choice, and he goes to college too under his GI bill, plus he has paid every unpaid medicial bill the insurance would not cover. When it should be split... and the list goes on. Thats the story.