helenewyork
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? NY
If no supervision for visitation has been ordered and the NCP is deemed fully and responsibly able to care for a child during visitation, can the CP deny visitation based on normally safe activities (that children of the same age group routinely participate in)? For instance going to the ocean, camping, riding a rollercoaster, etc. Assuming that the NCP is extremely concientious about safety and the childs' individual preferences and needs does the CP have the right to be notified of any and all normal, common (or exciting and fun but safe!) activities that might be enjoyed during visitation?
I ask the question due to CP interference. When all the obstacles regarding visitation scheduling have been used (and it is always lengthy and exhaustive finally falling short of legal interference) the CP then start in with demands concerning control over what the child will be doing, in minute detail because the CP must give approval before the child may go on visitation. Notwithstanding that the child has a long and incident-free history of healthy, positive, safe visitation with the NCP.
Just wondering how much a power a controller has that can be skewed as "justified" but is clearly manipulation. It appears that obsessive control knows no bounds.
If no supervision for visitation has been ordered and the NCP is deemed fully and responsibly able to care for a child during visitation, can the CP deny visitation based on normally safe activities (that children of the same age group routinely participate in)? For instance going to the ocean, camping, riding a rollercoaster, etc. Assuming that the NCP is extremely concientious about safety and the childs' individual preferences and needs does the CP have the right to be notified of any and all normal, common (or exciting and fun but safe!) activities that might be enjoyed during visitation?
I ask the question due to CP interference. When all the obstacles regarding visitation scheduling have been used (and it is always lengthy and exhaustive finally falling short of legal interference) the CP then start in with demands concerning control over what the child will be doing, in minute detail because the CP must give approval before the child may go on visitation. Notwithstanding that the child has a long and incident-free history of healthy, positive, safe visitation with the NCP.
Just wondering how much a power a controller has that can be skewed as "justified" but is clearly manipulation. It appears that obsessive control knows no bounds.