Civil lawsuit

[rights]

**A: you have said nothing and gave not answered my post.

There are several reasons why I have not answered your thread: (1) I am preceding [and] have proceded pro-se in this action additionally;(2) this action is currently pending: Therefore I cannot afford to add to the handicapps I have already mounted against me and prejudice my situation even more to my detriment than I already am.

I rather not give specifics and that it effect the responses to my questions on this "public board" than to prejudice my case in any manner whatsoever.

 

[rights]

brief aside from order to show cause

The trial court did not and, from the order, I think the appellate court agrees.

Hmm. You better have a heck of a record to refer to.

The governement already won. They will not substantively respond unless you win with the appellate court on the order to show cause. Then, they may reply to your appeal. If you win on the appeal, THEN they may address your factual issues.

Yes, they could, but they won't. They won't spend the resources on something which seems frivolous until the court forces them to address it. If there is a response, it will be a canned one done with a mail merge-type program for similar situations.

You are not going to make new law. If your goal is an exception to the established rule, your appeal may result in sanctions against you.

This response has been really gnawing at me where tranquility stated that the government won’t “substantively” respond unless the appellate court agrees with me in the order to show cause.

My question is this, I have a briefing schedule aside from the order to show cause where my brief is required to be filed in the near future. Should I wait for the court to issue a decision on the order to show cause? Or file it?