So far everybody is missing my point.
First of all. You people are communicating with a master prose litigator. Those two judges will not be wiping any floors with me. I sued Dyfus. Family and children services. Dyfus was already under monitor by one of the judges i'm sueing. He was presiding over this dyfus case. In cozine v nadine and charlie that monitor was protecting 60,000 kids. Dyfus lost and was under monitor. The fact that dyfus was in possession of my kids, we automatically become class members and is under this monitor.
Chesler was the presiding judge. The monitor was on the subject of only dyfus corruption. it never mention the judge nor mental health as part of their corruption. This is what i was doing adding the family court judge and mental health as part of their corruption. But Chesler came back dismissing my case with prejudice claiming i failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Thats the wiping the floor part. But in my original complaint i had authourity in there for joinder of claims. My case and Cozine case are related and we with the same presiding judge.
And i said these words in my complaint against Chesler the judge. "The defendents conspiracy arises out of unlawful, intentional, wilful and evil misconduct of retaliation and Government invidiously discriminatory against the plaintiff by denying this plaintiff the equal protection of the laws to wit- to single the plaintiff out from other persons similarly situated therby denying this plaintiff access to the court.
Chesler finding to me when he ruled on my dyfus case by claiming i didn't correctly alledge invidious discriminatory animus and then went to discrib what it takes to correctly allege discrimination.. He sealed his fate when he did that. Because thats actually what i alledged against him.
You see i had a “Common Nucleus of Operative Fact involved with the dyfus case. The only differrence is i added the family court judge and mental health as part of the corruption. federal rule 8 a requires that theres no need to state a claim if theres already a claim in the courts on related issues. So i sued the Government for Discriminating. The court stoled the complaint yes. For four months they refuse to docket my complaint. I had a filed stamp copy. The clerks didn't care. Fine ass female clerk too. lol. So i filed with the third circuit a judicial misconduct complaint. The chief Judge responded. Issued an order declaring i have public interest and for the clerk to docket my complaint. But what they did was terminated my case. I wrote a email. The chief Judge designated the case to A PA judge name Sanchez. This is where the case is at now. I emailed Sanshez and told him they terminated the case after the chief judge wrote the order. He issued an order that day stating that the case was terminated in error. And for the case to be re-open. I submiited my peliminary injunction documents. Snachez responded that day. Ordering motion set for deadline Jan 18, 2011. Nobody responded. And this is why i ask the the question i ask. Keep in mind the Government is at too much fault to win at this point. Everything is by the record on my allegation. Plus the chief Judge still never formally ruled on the Misconduct complaint. Corprruption have been nip in the bud. The Chief Judge is watching. Understand????
