problemmagnet2
Junior Member
Quote
I understand. It comes from the idea that the Federal government should have the top laws. However, our government gives states more responsibility to govern ourselves. Then, in a condominium situation the circle gets much smaller.
For example, I found this rule. So, basically, yes, if everyone votes on it, it can be a law. If not everyone votes then majority rules.
Unless otherwise provided in the declaration as originally recorded, no amendment may change the configuration or size of any unit in any material fashion, materially alter or modify the appurtenances to the unit, or change the proportion or percentage by which the unit owner shares the common expenses of the condominium and owns the common surplus of the condominium unless the record owner of the unit and all record owners of liens on the unit join in the execution of the amendment and unless all the record owners of all other units in the same condominium approve the amendment.
If the underlining didn't occur above I meant to underline from the words "unless the record owner of the unit...."
I heard on the radio the other day that in NYC privately owned condo buildings can vote to keep out Jews! Obviously, that's just an awful law. But it's legal. In most cities if you have too many Section 8 then it creates a problem for a prospective owner to secure a mortgage. That seems discriminatory, however, it's a law.
Still no word from Home Guru? If you stump him do you win a prize?
I understand. It comes from the idea that the Federal government should have the top laws. However, our government gives states more responsibility to govern ourselves. Then, in a condominium situation the circle gets much smaller.
For example, I found this rule. So, basically, yes, if everyone votes on it, it can be a law. If not everyone votes then majority rules.
Unless otherwise provided in the declaration as originally recorded, no amendment may change the configuration or size of any unit in any material fashion, materially alter or modify the appurtenances to the unit, or change the proportion or percentage by which the unit owner shares the common expenses of the condominium and owns the common surplus of the condominium unless the record owner of the unit and all record owners of liens on the unit join in the execution of the amendment and unless all the record owners of all other units in the same condominium approve the amendment.
If the underlining didn't occur above I meant to underline from the words "unless the record owner of the unit...."
I heard on the radio the other day that in NYC privately owned condo buildings can vote to keep out Jews! Obviously, that's just an awful law. But it's legal. In most cities if you have too many Section 8 then it creates a problem for a prospective owner to secure a mortgage. That seems discriminatory, however, it's a law.
Still no word from Home Guru? If you stump him do you win a prize?