I'd suggest getting a CO to sell the house and split the shortage needed to close the deal, if any, from other marital resources. Speaking from experience, most lenders would FAR rather work with the buyer on a short sale, than have a foreclosure. They also will be more cooperative if the seller shows some willingness to share the loss by agreeing to bring some cash to the table, rather than expecting the lender to shoulder the entire shortfall.
Lenders are really tired of buyers thinking their mortgage responsibilities are transitory and dependent on whether they want in or out of their relationship du jour. People just don't seem to understand what a LONG term commitment is supposed to be. Joint Mortgages, and kids, are SUPPOSED to be part of a LONG TERM relationship, not something one just does without thought and bails on a year or so later when they want to move on. Over the LONG term, real estate will always do well. It's not intended to be something one dumps in a year or so and never takes a loss in such a short term.
Lenders are really tired of buyers thinking their mortgage responsibilities are transitory and dependent on whether they want in or out of their relationship du jour. People just don't seem to understand what a LONG term commitment is supposed to be. Joint Mortgages, and kids, are SUPPOSED to be part of a LONG TERM relationship, not something one just does without thought and bails on a year or so later when they want to move on. Over the LONG term, real estate will always do well. It's not intended to be something one dumps in a year or so and never takes a loss in such a short term.
Last edited: