Do I have rights?

[Just Blue]

I didn't give legal advice.

I stated that in my experience when CP has a good reason to move and asks the court for permission it is often granted.

Do you have evidence that this is wrong? If not, then stop your abuse.

WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE? You are telling some guy in FLORIDA that he will have little chance of stopping a move by his ex. You said this advice is based on your experience. What is that experience?? You are in OK. Do you have "experience" in Florida?? Did you look up the stat's or case law for FLORIDA before making these assertions?? Back up what you are saying.

If you are not prepared to substantiate your advice on a thread you post to...STOP POSTING!

 

[LdiJ]

WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE? You are telling some guy in FLORIDA that he will have little chance of stopping a move by his ex. You said this advice is based on your experience. What is that experience?? You are in OK. Do you have "experience" in Florida?? Did you look up the stat's or case law for FLORIDA before making these assertions?? Back up what you are saying.

If you are not prepared to substantiate your advice on a thread you post to...STOP POSTING!

Bay...you are being a tad over the top here. People do get permission to relocate. If in his experience people with good reasons often get permission, who are we to say otherwise?

Like I said in my previous post, my observations (from the real world and from 15 years worth of posting on forums like these) that its more like 50/50.

 

[Just Blue]

Bay...you are being a tad over the top here. People do get permission to relocate. If in his experience people with good reasons often get permission, who are we to say otherwise?

Like I said in my previous post, my observations (from the real world and from 15 years worth of posting on forums like these) that its more like 50/50.

misstofolees stated that because the CP has full legal that almost certainly going to get permission to move. You and I KNOW that is not true. The reason for the move, per OP post, is to move in with her boyfriend. How many CP's get permission to move based on this?? Most?? No flippin' way. 50%?? Hardly. The mother will need much better reasoning than that.

? If she has sole legal custody, she's almost certainly going to be able to move with the child.

misstoffolees also alluded to vast court room experience and has yet to clarify.

I am not being over the top. I just want accurate advice given.

 

[Silverplum]

misstoffolees also alluded to vast court room experience and has yet to clarify.

I am not being over the top. I just want accurate advice given.

Eh, LdiJ thinks everybody else is "over the top."

I sure don't think you (or any of us) are wrong in any way for wondering what, precisely, is missotffolees vast experience? S/he never answers: I can only presume the honest answer would be, "his/her own case."

 

[mistoffolees]

misstoffolees also alluded to vast court room experience and has yet to clarify.

I never claimed any such thing. Perhaps you should start by reading what people write instead of making up stories.

 

[LdiJ]

Eh, LdiJ thinks everybody else is "over the top."

I sure don't think you (or any of us) are wrong in any way for wondering what, precisely, is missotffolees vast experience? S/he never answers: I can only presume the honest answer would be, "his/her own case."

I just don't think that any of us who are laypeople, should be quite that dismissive of other people's experiences/observations. This is a general discussion, not a nitty gritty one.

Its only fair that dad know that its not an absolute slam dunk for him. If he believes that its a slam dunk, he may not prepare as thoroughly as he should. Therefore he needs more than just one viewpoint.

 

[tuffbrk]

OP should just be aware that Mistle quite often makes sweeping statements - in a tell direct writing style which is almost always perceived by a reader to be accurate - about what is typical, the norm, etc. However the OP should be aware that the "experience" Mistle is basing these statemetns on has never been explained.

This is not the only forum in which Mistle posts in such an authoritative manner - which again - no one has any background to know whether the experience is valid or not.

So - long story short? "BUYER" BEWARE!!

 

[Darthpaul]

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to start all this. In truth, I felt I was not prepared and simply needed advise. The statutes that were posted for me were very informative and answered many questions. I thank you all for your advise and viewpoints including misstoffolees.

 

[Just Blue]

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to start all this. In truth, I felt I was not prepared and simply needed advise. The statutes that were posted for me were very informative and answered many questions. I thank you all for your advise and viewpoints including misstoffolees.

You're Welcome.

And you didn't start anything other than a thread...I just wanted to make sure what you were being told is somewhat accurate. Good luck!!

 

[Darthpaul]

Thanks again!

 

[mistoffolees]

OP should just be aware that Mistle quite often makes sweeping statements - in a tell direct writing style which is almost always perceived by a reader to be accurate - about what is typical, the norm, etc. However the OP should be aware that the "experience" Mistle is basing these statemetns on has never been explained.

I guess I forgot that you're the only one allowed to make statements that anyone should listen to.

Different people have different experiences. I shared mine. What right do you have to assert that it is invalid?

 

[Just Blue]

I guess I forgot that you're the only one allowed to make statements that anyone should listen to.

Different people have different experiences. I shared mine. What right do you have to assert that it is invalid?

Because your "experience" has nothing to do with OP's state or situation. It is misleading.

 

[acmb05]

I just don't think that any of us who are laypeople, should be quite that dismissive of other people's experiences/observations. This is a general discussion, not a nitty gritty one.

Its only fair that dad know that its not an absolute slam dunk for him. If he believes that its a slam dunk, he may not prepare as thoroughly as he should. Therefore he needs more than just one viewpoint.

Exactly why he should not be listening to mistoffolees because the way they stated it if the CP has full custody he would lose and he may not even try to fight it.

 

[LdiJ]

Exactly why he should not be listening to mistoffolees because the way they stated it if the CP has full custody he would lose and he may not even try to fight it.

Correct if mistoffolees was the only person who posted. However he was not the only person who posted, and if mistoffolees did not post what he did, causing me to post what I did, then the OP could very well have believed that it was a slam dunk for him as well.

Unfortunately, not too many people on these forums are willing to post opposing viewpoints because of the harshness those posts tend to generate. Sometimes those opposing viewpoints are not inaccurate, or are not entirely inaccurate, and often provide some "balance" to the advice that is being given.

Quite frankly, on the issue of relocations, if there is no balance, every CP that is considering moving would automatically forget about it, no matter how important it might be to them or their future, after getting advice from these forums. Every NCP would be unlikely to prepare much for their cases, because they would automatically believe that they would win a relocation case, after getting advice from these forums.

Balance is necessary.

 

[Ohiogal]

Nothing is EVER a slam dunk when it comes to custody.