It truly escapes me as how one could perceive that either Guam or California's statutes of repose limiting the time for the commencement of actions for damages suffered due to "patent and/or latent deficiencies in improvements to real property" could have a blessed thing to do with limiting the time for the commencement of an action against parties responsible seeking compensation for service performed in connection with the construction of any such improvements.
(Too much tropical Sun . . . jungle fever . . . . a falling coconut perhaps?)
Man I just realized you were the one that helped answer my question in the other thread I had. I was just about to ask you another question. LOL