Casa.. ...
Casa:Are you saying an attorney is lying in court stating a conversation happened with the school counselor, when it never happened?
LostWithoutHER:Yes... this is what I am saying! ! ! ! There was nothing, let me say it again, nothing erratic about my behavior. My daughter had a wonderful day, as did I . ... and her classmates when I volunteered that day. The father is pissed because he is too lazy- and doesn't care to participate in her education. .. so me attending school shows I care and am involved. He doesn't like this, so he had to make it appear in a negative way.
Casa:What, specifically, did the X say you did at the school? "Erratic" is a fairly broad description- could mean any number of things.
LostWithoutHER:That is what the order stated. ..was that I was 'erratic' at my child's school. He stated after that, that I 'threw her lunch away' and that she 'came home in tears' . .. let me explain. Yes, I did throw her cold packed lunch, the contents, away. I purchased her hot lunch, since for serveral weeks she had asked me why she didn't get to have hot lunch like the rest of the kids. That they have pizza days, and she is the only one who doesn't get to have it, because she is packed a cold lunch. We ate lunch together, I purchased her and I a hot lunch, which happened to be pizza that day. She came home in tears. .. I beleive it. This was a Thursday. ..and usually I would have picked her up on Friday's. .. but just prior to this... a week or so before. .. her father went to the courts to decrease my parenting time, saying that he works second shift and he doesn't get enough time with her. I was not able to make it to that hearing, I informed the courts of my circumstances. ... so, she was upset, when I was leaving, that she wouldn't see me for another week, since I didn't get to pick her up on Friday as I normally would have. The judge obviously granted his request.. .decreasing my time.. . and awarding him every other weekend. Prior to this. .. I had her every weekend and had never, ever missed a time with her.
Case:If your child sees a counselor, do you mean the school counselor or a therapist outside of the school? If it's the school counselor, then take the child to a therapist outside of the school- so you'll have another professional weighing in on if your child is having 'problems' or not. (What 'problems' did the counselor <supposedly> refer to?)
LostWithoutHER: No, she doesn't see a counselor, her father will not allow this. I called the school, spoke to the counselor briefly asking if she would talk to my daughter. I stated we are involved in a custody battle, and she could use someone to talk to. The counselor told me that she would have nothing to do with that, that she would not get in the middle of it. I voice my concerns, that if she is a school counselor, it is my understanding that if one reaches out, or expresses concerns, she should aknowledge that. I thanked her for her time and that was the end of the conversation. As of now.. .since his ex parte order was granted.. .. due to the 'erratic behavior'. .. I am only allowed to see her under 'supervised' parenting time. .. at a designated place. ..and not leave with her anywhere. I can't take her to a counselor. CPS is involved. .. due to an allegation against the father's wife. ...in which my daughter confided in me that she was being hit and pushed and shoved. The CPS worker urged counseling. ..and still they have not done this.
Casa:What does the school counselor say? You say the principal is willing to tell the court what did/didnt happen- but the allegation is about what the school counselor said. What do they say now, or to you? Also, what other "information" is it that the principal is reluctant to give you?
LostWithoutHER:The school principal has stated to me over the phone when I called to schedule further volunteering at the school. ..that there was an order in place saying I was not allowed to. I was not served with these ex parte papers. . I was only aware of them due to this occurence. I then had to go to the court to pick up the papers. .. .in which it would have been his attorney's job to serve me. Once I sent the principal a copy of the allegations, she verified that those were false allegations. ..and she would do what she can to help, but only if an attorney requests something. The counselor was brought up in court, when the father's attorney did not show up, he had to speak for himself. I asked where his proof was that I was erratic, and he stated the counselor called his attorney telling them that I had to be removed from the school. This is absolutely NOT true! I was never asked to leave. . .the day was wonderful. ... to all involved! I have not spoken to the counselor since this. ... I have spoken to the principal who stated she did not know of a reason the counselor would call their attorney. ..or why she would have done that.. .or how she would have know who their attorney was.
Casa:You can research online the requirements in your state to subpoena someone- An attorney isn't always the only one who can subpoena someone. Did you get a copy of your court file? Do you know if the subpoena for the principal was only for your last court date- or does it include the March court date?
LostWIthoutHER:I prepared the subpoenas myself. .and served them certified mail. It was only for the February date. ..and not March.
Casa:It would seem to me (though I'm not a judge) that if you say the Xs allegations are untrue- the burden will then be on your X to prove they are. If it never happened, how is he going to do that?
LostWithoutHER:He has no way to prove his allegations.. as their is absolutely no truth to them. He goes about things lying. .and that has kept him on the up side. His attorney lies. .and that has kept her on the up side. I am not a liar, I will not lie to win.
Casa
id you file a response to the Xs allegations? If so, did you include in your response that the allegations were untrue & that the principal and counselor are willing to testify that they are untrue?
LostWithoutHER:Yes, I filed a response to the allegations. That is why we were back in court February. I did not include that in my response, as I thought that subpoenaing the people would 'prove' that rather than talk about it.